LawCare Nigeria

Nigeria Legal Information & Law Reports

Col. Michael Olujimi Osisanya (Rtd) & 3 ORS -VS- Ministry of Defence

IN THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NIGERIA

IN THE LAGOS JUDICIAL DIVISION

HOLDEN AT LAGOS

BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE J. D. PETERS

 

DATE: JANUARY 18, 2018

SUIT NO: NICN/LA/151/2013

 

BETWEEN

  1. Colonel Michael Olujimi Osisanya (Rtd)
  2. Colonel Gabriel .O. Emodi (Rtd)
  3. Lt. Colonel Antonio Abayomi Jorge Ferreira (Rtd)  –
  4. Colonel Sunday Adekunle Majekodunmi (Rtd)

 

—Claimants

 

AND

 

  1.  Ministry of Defence
  2. Military Pensions Board
  3. Nigerian Army

 

———-Defendants

 

REPRESENTATION

Chukwuyem Atewe with Agnes Usufor  for the Claimants

Toyin Bashorun with Kofi Apori for 1st and 2nd Defendants

M.U. Ibrahim with Lema Abina for 3rd Defendant.

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

  1. Introduction & Claims

The Claimants by their General Form of Complaint dated 21/3/13 approached the Court and sought the following reliefs –

 

  1. A declaration that the decision of the Defendants, particularly the Military             Pensions Board, to base and continue to base the pensions payable to the         Claimants on their terminal ranks in the Army instead of on their Annual Terminal          Basic Salaries of a Major General in accordance with the Terms and Conditions         for (Officers) Nigerian Army, 1979, ‘Annexe’ A thereof to their disadvantage is         unconstitutional, unlawful, illegal, null and void and of no effect whatsoever.
  2. A declaration that the Claimants are entitled to have their pensions calculated and           paid on the basis of their Annual Terminal Basic Salaries of a Major General in       accordance with the Terms and Conditions for (Officers) Nigerian Army, 1979,             ‘Annexe’ A and Federal Ministry of Establishment and Management Services Circular Reference No. 8.63216/s. 1/x/618 of 13th September 1991.
  3. An order directing the Defendants to compute and pay to each of the Claimants the          shortfalls due to them on their pensions from November 2009 up to date to      judgment with interest at a rate not less than 10 per cent until liquidation.
  4. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants whether by themselves         agents, servants, officers and or privies from continuing to base the pensions          payable to the Claimants on their terminal ranks in the Army instead of on their      Annual Terminal Basic Salaries of a Major General in accordance with the Terms        and Conditions for (Officers) Nigerian Army, 1979, ‘Annexe’ A thereof to their           disadvantage.

 

The Claimants filed along with their Complaint their witness statements on oath, list of witness as well as list and copies of documents to be relied on at trial. 1st and 2nd Defendants filed their joint statement of defence on 12/5/15 including its witness statement on oath, list of witnesses, list and copies of documents to be relied on at trial. On 4/3/16, the 3rd Defendant filed its statement of defence along with all processes as required by the Rules of Court. Subsequently, the Claimant filed reply to the statements of defence filed by the defendants.

 

  1. Case of the Claimants

The Claimants opened their case on 16/9/15 and called the 1st Claimant as CW1. CW1 adopted witness depositions dated 21/3/13 and 10/3/16 as his evidence in chief and tendered 9 documents as exhibits. CW1 also adopted his further witness statement on oath dated 10/3/16 as his his further evidence. The documents were admitted in evidence and marked as Exh. MOO1 – Exh. MOO9. It is the case of the Claimants that the 1st Claimant was a Commissioned Officer in the Nigerian Army Medical Corps who voluntarily retired from the Nigerian Army as a Colonel/Chief Consultant Dental Surgeon in July 1991; that the 1st Claimant was enlisted into the Nigerian Army as a Cadet Officer on the 30th of October, 1967 and commissioned as a Lieutenant on the 8th day of June, 1972; that the 2nd Claimant was a Commissioned Officer in the Nigerian Army Medical Corps who voluntarily retired from the Nigerian Army as a Colonel/Chief Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist in September 1988; that the 2nd Claimant was commissioned on the 20/10/65; that the 3rd Claimant was a Commissioned Officer in the Nigerian Army Medical Corps, who voluntarily retired from the Nigerian Army as a Lieutenant Colonel/Chief Consultant Surgeon in October, 1983; that the 3rd Claimant was commissioned on the 27/7/67 though he proceeded on Terminal Leave in October, 1983 his voluntary retirement took effect from the 30/1/70; that the 4th Claimant was a Commissioned Officer in the Nigerian Army Medical Corps who voluntarily retired from the Nigerian Army as a Colonel and as a Chief Consultant Public Health on 30/9/88 and that the 4th Claimant was commissioned on the 15/4/68.

 

It is the case of the Claimants that on the 1st day of September, 1979 while the Claimants were still in the service of the Defendants, the Defendants made effective the Terms and Conditions for (Officers) Nigerian Army, 1979; that under the said “Terms and Conditions for (Officers) Nigerian Army, 1979 all medical officers who become Chief Consultants are automatically paid the same Annual Basic Salary as Major Generals in accordance with the Salary Scale applicable to all officers in Annex A thereof; that they all became Chief Consultants at different dates as duly published by the Army Council of the 3rd Defendant; that their appointments as Chief Consultants were published for the Claimants respectively as dated below; that upon their becoming Chief Consultants in their various area of specialization the Nigerian Army Pay Corps complied with the Terms and Conditions for (Officers) Nigerian Army, 1979 and paid to them until they left the 3rd Defendant salaries of Chief Consultants which ranked with salary payable to Major General though they wore their own ranks of Lieutenant Colonels and Colonels respectively; that in May 1991 the monthly basic pay of a Major General in the Army was =N=2,250.00 and those of them who were still in the service were also paid the same =N=2,250.00; that with the exception of the 3rd