No. 331
Argued: Decided: October 21, 1963
Albert O. Scafuro for appellants.
Squire R. Ogden for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [375 U.S. 43, 44]
375 U.S. 43 (1963) “>
U.S. Supreme Court
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, 375 U.S. 43 (1963)
375 U.S. 43
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 326.
Decided October 21, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
