Argued: Decided: April 22, 1889 Eppa Hunton, for plaintiffs in error. Geo. W. McCrary and Wallace Pratt, for defendant in…
Read MoreEX PARTE NIELSEN(1889)
Argued: Decided: May 13, 1889 This is an appeal from a final order of the district court for the First…
Read MoreDENT v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA(1889)
Argued: Decided: January 14, 1889 Under this statute, the plaintiff in error was indicted in the state circuit court of…
Read MoreCHAPMAN v. BARNEY(1889)
Argued: Decided: March 5, 1889 LAMAR, J. In its original form, this was an action of assumpsit, brought in the…
Read MoreCHAE CHAN PING v. U.S.(1889)
No. 138 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1889 This case comes before us on appeal from an order of the circuit…
Read MoreBUTLER v. BOSTON & S. S. S. CO.(1889)
Argued: Decided: April 22, 1889 The libelant thereupon claimed and petitioned that, in case it should be found that there…
Read MoreBOTILLER v. DOMINGUEZ(1889)
Argued: Decided: April 1, 1889 This is a writ of error to the supreme court of the state of California.…
Read MoreBAKER v. CUMMINGS(1889)
No. 207 Argued: Decided: December 19, 1889 A case between the same parties and growing out of the same transaction…
Read MoreARKANSAS VALLEY LAND & CATTLE CO. v. MANN(1889)
Argued: Decided: March 5, 1889 Hugh Butler and Wm. A. Maury, for plaintiff in error. E. T. Wells and R.…
Read MoreIN RE TERRY(1888)
Argued: Decided: November 12, 1888 Upon Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for petitioner.…
Read MoreIN RE SAWYER(1888)
Argued: Decided: January 9, 1888 Petition for writ Habeas Corpus. This was a petition for a writ of habeas corpus,…
Read MoreGUMBEL v. PITKIN(1888)
No. 33 Argued: Decided: January 9, 1888 This case was before this court on a motion to dismiss the writ…
Read MoreEX PARTE COY(1888)
Argued: Decided: May 14, 1888 D. W. Voorhees and Cyrus F. McNutt, for appellants. Atty. Gen. Garland and E. B.…
Read MoreDENNY v. BENNETT(1888)
Argued: Decided: November 26, 1888 C. D. O’Brien, for plaintiff in error. Ambrose N. Merrick, for defendant in error. MILLER,…
Read MoreCALLAN v. WILSON(1888)
No. 4308 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1888 This is an appeal from a judgment refusing, upon writ of habeas corpus,…
Read MoreCALIFORNIA v. CENTRAL PAC. R. CO.(1888)
No. 660 Argued: Decided: April 30, 1888 Mr. J. M. Wilson for plaintiffs in error. Geo. A. Johnson, Atty. Gen.,…
Read MoreBOWMAN v. CHICAGO & N.W. RY. CO.(1888)
Argued: Decided: March 19, 1888 This action was begun in the circuit court of the United States for the Northern…
Read MoreEX PARTE BAIN(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 28, 1887 Richard Walke, Leigh R. Page, and W. W. Crump, for petitioner. Atty. Gen. Garland and…
Read MoreCHICAGO, B & K C R CO v. STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL GUFFEY(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 7, 1887 L. T. Hatfield and A. W. Mullins, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Boone and…
Read MoreCHICAGO, B & K C R CO v. STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL GUFFEY(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 7, 1887 L. T. Hatfield and A. W. Mullins, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Boone and…
Read More
