Argued: Decided: January 10, 1887 C. Beckwith, for plaintiff in error. Henry Hitchcock and G. A. Finkelnburg, for defendant in…
Read MoreBORER v. CHAPMAN(1887)
Argued: Decided: January 10, 1887 W. P. Clough, for appellants, Borer, Adm’r, etc., and others. Chas. W. Hornor, for appellee,…
Read MoreBALDWIN v. FRANKS(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 7, 1887 A. L. Hart, for plaintiff in error. Hall McAllister, for defendant in error. WAITE, C.…
Read MoreAYERS, EX PARTE(1887)
Argued: Decided: December 5, 1887 Petition for writ of habeas corpus. A writ of habeas corpus, directed to the marshal…
Read MoreYICK WO v. HOPKINS(1886)
Argued: Decided: May 10, 1886 These two cases were argued as one, and depend upon precisely the same state of…
Read MoreEX PARTE ROYALL(1886)
Argued: Decided: March 1, 1886 The petition proceeds: ‘That on the second day of June, 1884, the grand jury of…
Read MoreCLARK v. WOOSTER(1886)
Argued: Decided: December 6, 1886 Fredk. P. Fish, for appellants, Clark, Ex’x, and others. Frederic H. Betts, for appellee, Wooster.…
Read MoreCHICAGO & N. W. RY. CO. v. OHLE(1886)
Argued: Decided: March 1, 1886 N. M. Hubbard and Chas. A. Clark, for plaintiff in error. S. S. Burdett, for…
Read MoreCHESAPEAKE & O R CO v. HOWARD(1886)
No. 247 Argued: Decided: November 16, 1886 The amended declaration of the plaintiffs below alleged that the train on which…
Read MoreCHAFFIN v. TAYLOR(1886)
Argued: Decided: February 1, 1886 A former judgment in this case rendered against the plaintiff in error by the supreme…
Read MoreBUZARD v. HOUSTON(1886)
Argued: Decided: December 13, 1886 This was a bill in equity, filed November 23, 1881, by Buzard and Hillard, citizens…
Read MoreBROWN v. GRANT(1886)
Argued: Decided: January 4, 1886 This is an appeal from the final decree of the circuit court of the United…
Read MoreBOYD v. U S(1886)
No. 47 Argued: Decided: February 1, 1886 E. B. Smith and S. G. Clarke, for plaintiffs in error. Sol. Gen.…
Read MoreANDERSON v. TOWNSHIP OF SANTA ANNA, DE WITT COUNTY(1886)
Argued: Decided: January 4, 1886 Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of…
Read MoreSOON HING v. CROWLEY(1885)
Argued: Decided: March 16, 1885 The ordinance was adopted to regulate the establishment and maintenance of public laundries and wash-houses…
Read MoreEX PARTE BIGELOW(1885)
Argued: Decided: February 2, 1885 Robert Christy, for petitioner. MILLER, J. This is an application for a writ of habeas…
Read MoreERHARDT v. BOARO(1885)
Argued: Decided: March 2, 1885 This is an action for the possession of a mining claim in Pioneer mining district,…
Read MoreCOLE v. CITY OF LA GRANGE(1885)
No. 23 Argued: Decided: January 5, 1885 This was an action to recover the amount of coupons for interest from…
Read MoreCHICAGO, R.I. & P. RY. CO. v. MCGLINN(1885)
Argued: Decided: May 4, 1885 W. Hallett Phillips, for defendant in error. FIELD, J. This case comes here from the…
Read MoreCHESAPEAKE & O R CO v. MILLER(1885)
Argued: Decided: April 6, 1885 C. C. Watts, for defendant in error. MATTHEWS, J. This writ of error brings into…
Read More
