Argued: Decided: January 4, 1892 A. H. Garland, for plaintiffs in error. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for the United States.…
Read MoreBOYD v. STATE OF NEBRASKA(1892)
No. 42 Argued: Decided: February 1, 1892 On the 13th of January, A. D. 1891. leave was granted to John…
Read MoreBENSON v. U.S.(1892)
No. 1007 Argued: Decided: December 5, 1892 Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for the United States. Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the…
Read MoreBALLOCH v. HOOPER(1892)
No. 21 Argued: Decided: December 5, 1892 S. S. Henkle, for appellant. Job Barnard and Jas. S. Edwards, for appellees.…
Read MoreKNIGHT v. UNITED LAND ASS’N(1891)
No. 40 Argued: Decided: December 21, 1891 The complaint, filed on the 23d of November, 1880, alleged that the plaintiffs…
Read MoreCRUTCHER v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1891)
Argued: Decided: May 25, 1891 This case arose at Frankfort, Franklin county, Ky., upon an indictment found against Crutcher, the…
Read MoreCOOK v. U S(1891)
No. 2030 Argued: Decided: January 26, 1891 Jos. Frease, Wm. R. Day, John F. Dillon, Geo. R. Peck, and W.…
Read MoreCLARK THREAD CO. v. WILLIMANTIC LINEN CO.(1891)
Argued: Decided: May 25, 1891 Livingston Gifford and Edmund Wetmore, for appellant. W. C. Miller, Clarence A. Seward, W. H.…
Read MoreCITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. NEW ORLEANS WATER-WORKS CO.(1891)
No. 909 Argued: Decided: December 14, 1891 The facts of the case fully appear in the following statement by Mr.…
Read MoreBRIMMER v. REBMAN(1891)
Argued: Decided: January 19, 1891 R. Taylor Scott, Atty. Gen. Va., and R. M. Hughes, for appellant. Wm. J. Campbell,…
Read MoreALEXANDER v. U S(1891)
Argued: Decided: February 2, 1891 A. H. Garland and Heber J. May, for plaintiff in error. Sol. Gen. Taft, for…
Read MoreAUDUBON v. SHUFELDT(1901)
No. 217 Argued: April 8, 1901Decided: May 20, 1901 Mr. Henry Randall Webb for appellants. Mr. John T. Deweese for…
Read MoreANSLEY v. AINSWORTH(1901)
No. 136 Argued: Decided: February 11, 1901 This was a bill filed in the United States court in and for…
Read MoreAMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO v. U S(1901)
No. 225 Argued: April 12, 1901Decided: May 20, 1901 Messrs. H. B. Closson and John E. Parsons for petitioner. Assistant…
Read MoreAMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS(1901)
No. 535 Argued: Decided: April 29, 1901 This was a petition for a writ of certiorari requiring the United States…
Read MoreCHEROKEE NATION v. SOUTHERN KAN. R. CO.(1890)
Argued: Decided: May 19, 1890 Geo. R. Peck, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Browne, for appellee. Mr. Justice HARLAN,…
Read MoreBELL’S GAP R. CO. v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA(1890)
Argued: Decided: March 10, 1890 James W. M. Newlin, Wayne MacVeagh, M. E. Olmsted, and W. B. Lamberton, for plaintiff…
Read MoreAUFFMORDT v. HEDDEN(1890)
No. 712 Argued: Decided: December 8, 1890 Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for defendant in error. BLATCHFORD, J. This is an…
Read MoreARNDT v. GRIGGS(1890)
Argued: Decided: March 17, 1890 W. J. Lamb and Ricketts & Wilson, for plaintiffs in error. N. K. Griggs, for…
Read MoreKENNON v. GILMER(1889)
Argued: Decided: May 13, 1889 M. F. Morris, for Kennon. Nathaniel Wilson and J. Hubley Ashton, for Gilmer and others.…
Read More
