No. 316
Argued: Decided: October 10, 1966
Wilfred C. Varn for appellant.
J. Lewis Hall for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
385 U.S. 11 (1966) “>
U.S. Supreme Court
MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, 385 U.S. 11 (1966)
385 U.S. 11
MASLOWSKY ET AL. v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 574.
Decided October 10, 1966.
34 Ill. 2d 456, 216 N. E. 2d 669, appeal dismissed.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., and Thomas P. Sullivan for appellants.
Owen Rall for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 11, 12]
