No. 199
Argued: Decided: January 24, 1916
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U.S. 596, 600 , 57 S. L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U.S. 123, 137 , 58 S. L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U.S. 380, 382 , 59 S. L. ed. 279, 281, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U.S. 361 , 48 L. ed. 1018, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 673; Davis v. Massa- [241 U.S. 639, 640] chusetts, 167 U.S. 43 , 42 L. ed. 71, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 731; (3) Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U.S. 389 , 40 L. ed. 467, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 344; Washington v. Miller, 235 U.S. 422, 429 , 59 S. L. ed. 295, 299, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; Roby v. South Park Comrs. 238 U.S. 610 , 59 L. ed. 1488, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 791.
