Argued: Decided: January 4, 1886 This is an appeal from the final decree of the circuit court of the United…
Read MoreBOYD v. U S(1886)
No. 47 Argued: Decided: February 1, 1886 E. B. Smith and S. G. Clarke, for plaintiffs in error. Sol. Gen.…
Read MoreANDERSON v. TOWNSHIP OF SANTA ANNA, DE WITT COUNTY(1886)
Argued: Decided: January 4, 1886 Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of…
Read MoreSOON HING v. CROWLEY(1885)
Argued: Decided: March 16, 1885 The ordinance was adopted to regulate the establishment and maintenance of public laundries and wash-houses…
Read MoreEX PARTE BIGELOW(1885)
Argued: Decided: February 2, 1885 Robert Christy, for petitioner. MILLER, J. This is an application for a writ of habeas…
Read MoreERHARDT v. BOARO(1885)
Argued: Decided: March 2, 1885 This is an action for the possession of a mining claim in Pioneer mining district,…
Read MoreCOLE v. CITY OF LA GRANGE(1885)
No. 23 Argued: Decided: January 5, 1885 This was an action to recover the amount of coupons for interest from…
Read MoreCHICAGO, R.I. & P. RY. CO. v. MCGLINN(1885)
Argued: Decided: May 4, 1885 W. Hallett Phillips, for defendant in error. FIELD, J. This case comes here from the…
Read MoreCHESAPEAKE & O R CO v. MILLER(1885)
Argued: Decided: April 6, 1885 C. C. Watts, for defendant in error. MATTHEWS, J. This writ of error brings into…
Read MoreCAMPBELL v. HOLT(1885)
Argued: Decided: December 7, 1885 W. W. Boyce, for plaintiff in error. F. Charles Hume, for defendant in error. MILLER,…
Read MoreBROWN v. HOUSTON(1885)
No. 77 Argued: Decided: May 4, 1885 J. P. Hornor and C. W. Hornor, for plaintiffs in error. No appearance…
Read MoreBAYLIS v. TRAVELERS’ INS CO OF HARTFORD, CONN.(1885)
Argued: Decided: February 2, 1885 This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error to recover upon a policy…
Read MoreALLEN v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.(1885)
Argued: Decided: April 20, 1885 F. S. Blair, Atty. Gen., R. t. Merrick, and A. H. Garland, for appellants. John…
Read MoreMEMPHIS & L R R CO v. BERRY(1884)
Argued: Decided: December 22, 1884 B. C. Brown, for plaintiff in error. U. M. Rose, for defendant in error. This…
Read MoreTHE KU KLUX CASES(1884)
Argued: Decided: March 3, 1884 Henry B. Tompkins, for petitioners. Sol. Gen. Phillips, for respondent. MILLER, J. This case originates…
Read MoreU S v. WADDELL(1884)
No. 959 Argued: Decided: November 3, 1884 Sol. Gen. Phillips, for plaintiff. Jos. W. Martin, for defendants. MILLER, J. This…
Read MoreHURTADO v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA(1884)
Argued: Decided: March 3, 1884 The constitution of the state of California adopted in 1879, in article 1, 8, provides…
Read MoreBUTTERWORTH v. U S EX REL HOE(1884)
No. 238 Argued: Decided: November 3, 1884 Sol. Gen. Phillips, for plaintiff in error. A. J. Willard, for defendant in…
Read MoreBUTCHERS’ UNION CO. v. CRESCENT CITY CO.(1884)
Argued: Decided: May 5, 1884 B. R. Forman, for appellant. Thos. J. Semmes, for appellee. MILLER, J. This is an…
Read MoreBURROW-GILES LITHOGRAPHIC CO. v. SARONY(1884)
No. 18 Argued: Decided: March 17, 1884 David Calman, for plaintiff in error. Augustus T. Gurlitz, for defendant in error.…
Read More
