No. 33 Argued: Decided: January 9, 1888 This case was before this court on a motion to dismiss the writ…
Read MoreEX PARTE COY(1888)
Argued: Decided: May 14, 1888 D. W. Voorhees and Cyrus F. McNutt, for appellants. Atty. Gen. Garland and E. B.…
Read MoreDENNY v. BENNETT(1888)
Argued: Decided: November 26, 1888 C. D. O’Brien, for plaintiff in error. Ambrose N. Merrick, for defendant in error. MILLER,…
Read MoreCALLAN v. WILSON(1888)
No. 4308 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1888 This is an appeal from a judgment refusing, upon writ of habeas corpus,…
Read MoreCALIFORNIA v. CENTRAL PAC. R. CO.(1888)
No. 660 Argued: Decided: April 30, 1888 Mr. J. M. Wilson for plaintiffs in error. Geo. A. Johnson, Atty. Gen.,…
Read MoreBOWMAN v. CHICAGO & N.W. RY. CO.(1888)
Argued: Decided: March 19, 1888 This action was begun in the circuit court of the United States for the Northern…
Read MoreEX PARTE BAIN(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 28, 1887 Richard Walke, Leigh R. Page, and W. W. Crump, for petitioner. Atty. Gen. Garland and…
Read MoreCHICAGO, B & K C R CO v. STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL GUFFEY(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 7, 1887 L. T. Hatfield and A. W. Mullins, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Boone and…
Read MoreCHICAGO, B & K C R CO v. STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL GUFFEY(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 7, 1887 L. T. Hatfield and A. W. Mullins, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Boone and…
Read MoreCHICAGO & A R CO v. WIGGINS FERRY CO(1887)
Argued: Decided: January 10, 1887 C. Beckwith, for plaintiff in error. Henry Hitchcock and G. A. Finkelnburg, for defendant in…
Read MoreBORER v. CHAPMAN(1887)
Argued: Decided: January 10, 1887 W. P. Clough, for appellants, Borer, Adm’r, etc., and others. Chas. W. Hornor, for appellee,…
Read MoreBALDWIN v. FRANKS(1887)
Argued: Decided: March 7, 1887 A. L. Hart, for plaintiff in error. Hall McAllister, for defendant in error. WAITE, C.…
Read MoreAYERS, EX PARTE(1887)
Argued: Decided: December 5, 1887 Petition for writ of habeas corpus. A writ of habeas corpus, directed to the marshal…
Read MoreYICK WO v. HOPKINS(1886)
Argued: Decided: May 10, 1886 These two cases were argued as one, and depend upon precisely the same state of…
Read MoreEX PARTE ROYALL(1886)
Argued: Decided: March 1, 1886 The petition proceeds: ‘That on the second day of June, 1884, the grand jury of…
Read MoreCLARK v. WOOSTER(1886)
Argued: Decided: December 6, 1886 Fredk. P. Fish, for appellants, Clark, Ex’x, and others. Frederic H. Betts, for appellee, Wooster.…
Read MoreCHICAGO & N. W. RY. CO. v. OHLE(1886)
Argued: Decided: March 1, 1886 N. M. Hubbard and Chas. A. Clark, for plaintiff in error. S. S. Burdett, for…
Read MoreCHESAPEAKE & O R CO v. HOWARD(1886)
No. 247 Argued: Decided: November 16, 1886 The amended declaration of the plaintiffs below alleged that the train on which…
Read MoreCHAFFIN v. TAYLOR(1886)
Argued: Decided: February 1, 1886 A former judgment in this case rendered against the plaintiff in error by the supreme…
Read MoreBUZARD v. HOUSTON(1886)
Argued: Decided: December 13, 1886 This was a bill in equity, filed November 23, 1881, by Buzard and Hillard, citizens…
Read More
