Sir William Forbes, Appellant.—Gifford—Warren—Walker v. J. Gibson, Respondent.—Wetherell—Thomson—Grant—Fullerton—MurrayMay 23. 1821. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Process — Title to Pursue. — 1. Whether…
Read MorePetition and Case of John Bowes v Counter Petition and Claim for Thomas Bowes
Petition and Case of John Bowes, an infant, claiming the titles, honours, and dignities of Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorn,…
Read MoreMrs. Baillie v General Baillie
Mrs. Baillie, Appellant.—Romilly—Clerk—Robinson v. General Baillie, Respondent.—Cranstoun—Jeffrey—Fullerton—CockburnMay 23. 1821. Bill-Chamber. Lord Reston. Subject_Divorce. — Held (affirming the judgment of the…
Read MoreJoseph Astley v John Taylor
Joseph Astley, Appellant.—Warren—More v. John Taylor, Respondent.—Romilly—ForsythJune 25. 1821. Lord Meadowbank. Subject_Patent. — The Court of Session having fonnd that…
Read MoreJohn Watt v David Blair
John Watt, Appellant.—Warren—Noland v. David Blair, The Trustees for Fisheries, &c., in Scotland, and J. Campbell and T. Williamson, Respondents.—Gifford—MoncreiffJune…
Read MoreSir James Montgomery v Walter Francis
Sir James Montgomery, Bart., and Others, Appellants v. Walter Francis, Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry, and Others, Respondentsand John Hyslop,…
Read MoreJ. Gibson v Sir Wm. Forbes
J. Gibson, Appellant.—Romilly—Clerk—Thomson—W. Murray—J. A. Murray v. Sir Wm. Forbes, Respondent.—Gifford—Warren—WalkerMay 23. 1821. Subject_Freehold Qualification — Jurisdiction. — Held (affirming…
Read MoreEarl of Elgin v Robert Wellwood
Earl of Elgin, Appellant.—Romilly—Erskine—Bell v. Robert Wellwood, Respondent.—Clerk—MoncreiffJune 13. 1821. Lord Armadale. Subject_Entail. — Held (affirming the judgment of the…
Read MoreDr. James R. Barclay v Right Hon. W. Adam
Dr. James R. Barclay, Appellant.—Moncreiff—Keay v. Right Hon. W. Adam, Respondent.—Clerk—Irvine—CranstounMay 18. 1821. Lord Gillies. Subject_Tailzie. — Held (affirming the…
Read MoreA. Wallace, for the Glasgow Glass-Work Company v J. Geddes
. Wallace, for the Glasgow Glass-Work Company, Appellant.—Leach—Cuninghame v. J. Geddes, Respondent.—Warren—ForsythJune 13. 1821. Lord Craig. Subject_Interest — Expenses. —…
Read MoreDennistoun, Buchanan, and Company v D. Lillie and Others
Dennistoun, Buchanan, and Company, Appellants.—Sol.-Gen. Wedderburn—Romilly—Cranstoun v. D. Lillie and Others, Respondents.—Wetherell—DenmanApril 5. 1821. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Insurance. — Held (affirming…
Read MoreSir Wm. F. Eliott v George Pott
Sir Wm. F. Eliott, Appellant.—Fullerton—Brougham v. George Pott, Respondent.—Dean of Fac. Ross—MackenzieMar. 14. 1821. Lord Gillies. Subject_Entail — Lease. —…
Read MoreSamuel Stirling v Robert Forrester
Samuel Stirling, and Others, Appellants v. Robert Forrester, Esq., Treasurer to the Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland,…
Read MoreRobert Angus and Others v Duncan Montgomerie
Robert Angus and Others, Appellants.—Romilly—Moncreiff v. Duncan Montgomerie, D. Wishart, Captain John Montgomerie, and J. Gulland, Respondents.—Warren—GrantMar. 2. 1821. Subject_Burgh…
Read MoreMrs. Linwood and Children v V. Hathorn
Mrs. Linwood and Children, Appellants.—Baird—Fullerton v. V. Hathorn, Respondent.—Romilly—A. BellMar. 19. 1821. Lord Craigie. Subject_Reparation — Assythment. — A landed…
Read MoreJohn Dingwall v Rev. George Gardiner
John Dingwall, Appellant—Lord Advocate Maconochie—Romilly—Horner—J. A. Maconochie v. Rev. George Gardiner, Respondent—Leach—ConnellLord Pitmilly. Mar. 2. 1821. Subject_Manse — Stat. 1663,…
Read MoreSir J. G. Sinclair, Bart v William Manson
Sir J. G. Sinclair, Bart. Appellant—Leach—Cuninghame v. William Manson, Respondent—Grant—JardineFeb. 21. 1821. Lord Succoth. Subject_Landlord and Tenant — Clause. —…
Read MoreSir Henry Hay v Rev. David Hogarth
Sir Henry Hay M’Dougall, Bart. Appellant—Romilly—Leach—Forbes v. Rev. David Hogarth, Respondent—Clerk—JardineFeb. 23. 1821. Lord Reston. Subject_Valuation — Proof. — Held…
Read MoreWilliam Arbuthnott, Esq. v James Gibson, Esq. of Ingliston
William Arbuthnott, Esq. Appellant v. James Gibson, Esq. of Ingliston, Respondent1821. Whether a summons at the suit of a freeholder,…
Read MoreThe United Company of Merchants of England v Roger Kynaston, Esq.
The United Company of Merchants of England, Trading to the East Indies Appellants v. Roger Kynaston, Esq. Respondent *1821. The…
Read More
