Edward Bell and Others, Representatives of the late Robert Bell, Appellants.—Warren—Courtenay v. Andrew Willison and James Bell, Respondents:—Gifford—MacfarlaneJuly 8. 1822.…
Read MoreCharles Ferrier V James Hector
Charles Ferrier and Others, Lyell’s Trustees, Appellants.—Gifford—Clerk—Jameson v. James Hector, Respondent.—Cranstoun—VereMay 24. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Trust — Mutual Contract. —…
Read MoreRobert Cargill V Craigie
Robert Cargill, Appellant.—Greenshields—Moncreiff v. Craigie, Respondent.—Cranstoun—HendersonApril 1. 1822. Lord Robertson. Subject_Sale. — A party haring sold an heritable property, on…
Read MoreRobert Dowie V James Douglas
Robert Dowie, Appellant.—Clerk—L’Amy—Brownlee v. James Douglas, Respondent.—Jeffrey—HunterMarch 27. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Jurisdiction — Consuetude — Reparation. — Held (affirming the…
Read MoreLady Mary L. Craufurd V Archibald Reid
Lady Mary L. Craufurd, Appellant—Forsyth—Adam v. Archibald Reid, Respondent.—Fullerton—BroughamMarch 13. 1822. Lord Glenlee. Subject_Master and Servant. — Circumstances in which…
Read MoreJohn Boyes V Mrs. Scott Waring
John Boyes, Appellant,—Clerk—Millar v. Mrs. Scott Waring, Respondent.—Gifford.—ForsythMarch 6. 1822. Lord Craigie. Subject_Factor, — Circumstances in which it was held,…
Read MoreJohn Balfour V William Borthwick
John Balfour and James Gibson, Appellants.—Gifford—Clerk—Moncreiff—Skene v. William Borthwick, for the East Lothian Bank, Respondent.—Cranstoun—LockhartMarch 27. 1822. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Cautioner.…
Read MoreJames Glass and Others V William Hunter
James Glass and Others, for the Corporation of Hammermen of Leith, Appellants.—Gifford—Baird v. William Hunter, Respondent.—Lord Advocate Rae—CullenMarch 27. 1822.…
Read MoreThe Duke of Roxburghe V Lieut.-General Ker
The Duke of Roxburghe, Appellant v. Lieut.-General Ker, RespondentHouse of Lords, 3d, 17th and 24th May 1822. Subject_Bastardy — Sasine…
Read MoreDavid Carnegy V Miss Margaret Scott
David Carnegy, Appellant.—Romilly—Clerk—Fullerton v. Miss Margaret Scott, Respondent.—Gifford—Moncreiff—H. J. RobertsonMarch 6. 1822. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Landlord and Tenant — Clause. —…
Read MoreArchibald Newbigging V A. M’Gregor and Company and Others
Archibald Newbigging and Others, Appellants.—Romilly—Ivory v. A. M’Gregor and Company and Others, Respondents.—Scarlett—GreenshieldsSubject_Insurance. — A ship having, during the subsistence…
Read MoreMurdo M’Kenzie V David Ross and his Curators
Murdo M’Kenzie, Appellant—Moncreiff—Skene v. David Ross and his Curators, Respondents—Adam—Cockburn—MaitlandFeb. 15. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Jury Court — 55. Geo. III.…
Read MoreMurdo M’Kenzie V David Ross and his Curators
Murdo M’Kenzie, Appellant—Moncreiff—Skene v. David Ross and his Curators, Respondents—Adam—Cockburn—MaitlandFeb. 15. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Proof — Jury Court — 55.…
Read MoreJean Humphry V James Aitken
Jean Humphry, Appellant—Jeffrey—Brownlee v. James Aitken, Respondent—Feb. 18. 1822. Lord Craigie. Subject_Proof — Semiplena Probatio — Bastard. — 1. —…
Read MoreW. and R. Russell and W. Moffat V Shannon, Stewart, and Company
W. and R. Russell and W. Moffat, Appellants.—Copley—Pollock v. Shannon, Stewart, and Company, Respondents.—Clerk—CuninghameJuly 27. 1821. Lord Gillies. Subject_Shipmaster —…
Read MoreSir James Montgomerie V Duke of Buccleuch
Sir James Montgomerie and Others, Executors of William Duke of Queensberry, Appellants.—Irvine—Cranstoun v. Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry and his…
Read MoreMrs. Nasmyth and Others V Dr. Hare and Others
Mrs. Nasmyth and Others, Appellants.—Scarlett—Lushingion v. Dr. Hare and Others, Respondents.—Romilly—MackenzieJuly 27. 1821. Lord Craigie. Subject_Testament. — Held (reversing the…
Read MoreJohn Hislop V Duke of Buccleuch
John Hislop, Appellant.—Moncreiff—Maconochie—Whigham v. Duke of Buccleuch, Respondent.—Gifford—MackenzieJuly 2. 1821. Lords Craigie and Cringletie. Subject_Entail — Lease — Purgation. —…
Read MoreWilliam Arbuthnot v James Gibson
William Arbuthnot, Appellant.—Gifford—Cranstoun—L’Amy—Walker v. James Gibson, Respondent.—Thomson—Fullerton—MurrayMay 23. 1821. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Title to Pursue. — 1. Whether it is competent…
Read MoreS. Stirling and Others v R. Forrester
S. Stirling and Others, Trustees of the late John M’Kenzie, Appellants.—Romilly—Rutherfurd v. R. Forrester, for the Bank of Scotland, Respondent.—Cockburn—WalkerJune…
Read More
