Lawcare Nigeria provides all the Laws of Federation of Nigeria in a readable format. We provide access to statutes in Nigeria, LFN 2004 or updated LFN to enable lawyers, law students and general public world-wide have access to the Nigerian Acts of the National Assembly without cost whenever they desire. You can download LFN 2004 in pdf form, the file name is LFN pdf.

Our major goal at LawCare Nigeria is to ensure Lawyers can access the important legal materials required for their services and to assist law students,statutes in Nigeria and legal researchers to get the important legislations required for their works. In the same vein, we believe the general public also have the duties to check or read prevailing legislations in the country whenever they so desire without barrier. It is upon all the above stated facts we have ensured that have provided an online platform where both the people in legal industry and general public can quickly access the prevailing statutes in Nigeria.

Lawcare Nigeria also strives to ensure the latest legislations, as passed by the Nigerian National Assembly are uploaded to our online platform without any delay.

The various legislations uploaded to our online platform are also inclusive of schedules and statutory forms where required. And we ensure the accurate numbering of all uploaded legislations.

John Innes, W. S V Mary Baroness Mordaunt

John Innes, W. S.,     Appellant—Clerk—Cranstoun—Skene v. Mary Baroness Mordaunt, and Duke of Gordon,     Respondents—Gifford—Warren—Lumsden—RobertsonJuly 5. 1822. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Tailzie — Personal Objection — Process — Appeal. — Held, (affirming the judgment of the Court of Session,) 1.…

Continue ReadingJohn Innes, W. S V Mary Baroness Mordaunt

James Duke of Roxburghe V Lieut.-Gen. Walter Kerr

James Duke of Roxburghe,     Appellant.—Gifford—Mackenzie—Riddell v. Lieut.-Gen. Walter Kerr,     Respondent.—Clerk—Cranstoun—Thomson—FullertonMay 24. 1822. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Proof.— Circumstances in which it was held, (affirming the judgment of the Court of Session,) that the description of a person in an…

Continue ReadingJames Duke of Roxburghe V Lieut.-Gen. Walter Kerr

James Carrick V James Martin and Company

James Carrick,     Appellant.—Gifford—Forsyth v. James Martin and Company, and Thomas Martin and Company,     Respondents.—Clerk—Skene—RutherfurdJuly 26. 1822. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Meditatio Fugœ Warrant. — Circumstances under which it was held, (affirming the judgment of the Court of Session,) that it is…

Continue ReadingJames Carrick V James Martin and Company

Hon. Mary F. E. Stewart Mackenzie V Hon. Francis C. E. S. K. Mackenzie

Hon. Mary F. E. Stewart Mackenzie and Husband,     Appellants.—Warren—Clerk—Adam v. Hon. Francis C. E. S. K. Mackenzie and Others,     Respondents.—Jeffrey—MoncreiffMay 13. 1822. Lord Craigie. Subject_Entail.— An entail having been made in favour of A. and his heirs,—whom failing,…

Continue ReadingHon. Mary F. E. Stewart Mackenzie V Hon. Francis C. E. S. K. Mackenzie

Hon. Marianne Mackay Hamilton Fullarton V Sir Hew Dalrymple Hamilton

Hon. Marianne Mackay Hamilton Fullarton,     Appellant.—Gifford—Forsyth v. Sir Hew Dalrymple Hamilton,     Respondent.—Thomson—JamesonJuly 26. 1822. Lord Reston. Subject_Res Judicata — Prescription — Tailzie. — An heir of entail having brought an action of reduction of certain deeds…

Continue ReadingHon. Marianne Mackay Hamilton Fullarton V Sir Hew Dalrymple Hamilton

Edward Bell and Others V Andrew Willison and James Bell

Edward Bell and Others, Representatives of the late Robert Bell,     Appellants.—Warren—Courtenay v. Andrew Willison and James Bell,     Respondents:—Gifford—MacfarlaneJuly 8. 1822. Lords Gillies and Bannatyne. Subject_Society—Process.— It having been stipulated in a contract of copartnery, that in the event of the…

Continue ReadingEdward Bell and Others V Andrew Willison and James Bell

Charles Ferrier V James Hector

Charles Ferrier and Others, Lyell's Trustees,     Appellants.—Gifford—Clerk—Jameson v. James Hector,     Respondent.—Cranstoun—VereMay 24. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Trust — Mutual Contract. — A tenant having entered into an agreement with his landlord to renounce his lease at a particular…

Continue ReadingCharles Ferrier V James Hector