No. 775 Argued: Decided: March 4, 1895 The defendant, Harry F. Batchelor, was indicted, on section 5209 of the Revised…
Read MoreBARNEY v. RICKARD(1895)
No. 218 Argued: Decided: April 1, 1895 Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered…
Read MoreBARDON v. LAND & RIVER IMPROVEMENT CO.(1895)
No. 138 Argued: Decided: March 25, 1895 The section in question is as follows: ‘Sec. 3186. Any person having the…
Read MoreBALLEW v. U.S.(1895)
No. 547 Argued: Decided: December 16, 1895 At the October term, 1893, of the circuit court of the United States…
Read MoreANDREWS v. SWARTZ(1895)
No. 710 Argued: Decided: February 4, 1895 Geo. M. Shipman, for appellant. Wm. A. Stryker, for respondent. Mr. Justice HARLAN…
Read MoreANDES v. ELY(1895)
No. 295 Argued: Decided: May 20, 1895 This was an action by Dudley P. Ely against the town of Andes…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1895)
No. 788 Argued: Decided: April 8, 1895 The evidence certified to us by the bill of exceptions shows that Philip…
Read MoreABRAHAM v. ORDWAY(1895)
No. 274 Argued: Decided: May 20, 1895 H. O. Claughton and F. N. Mackey, for appellants. J. J. Darlington, for…
Read MoreBOGLE v. MAGONE(1894)
No. 291 Argued: Decided: April 9, 1894 Action at law brought by William B. Bogle, Ruluf Lyles, Alexander Scott, and…
Read MoreBARDEN v. NORTHERN PAC R CO(1894)
No. 612 Argued: Decided: May 26, 1894 This action was brought by the Northern Pacific Railroad Company against Richard P.…
Read MoreBAER v. MORAN BROS. CO.(1894)
No. 683 Argued: Decided: April 30, 1894 T. H. N. McPherson, John H. Mitchell, and M. L. Baer, for plaintiff…
Read MoreASHLEY v. RYAN(1894)
No. 888 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1894 This was an action by Ossian D. Ashley, Thomas H. Hubbard, James F.…
Read MoreANVIL MINING CO v. HUMBLE(1894)
No. 323 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1894 This was an action by John Humble, Joseph H. Johns, and James Johns,…
Read MoreANGLE v. CHICAGO, ST. P., M. & O. RY. CO.(1894)
No. 73 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1894 Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER: This is an appeal from a decree of…
Read MoreALSOP v. RIKER(1894)
No. 59 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1894 Andrew J. Riker, in pro. per. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of…
Read MoreALLIS v. U S(1894)
No. 661 Argued: Decided: November 12, 1894 The indictment consisted of 25 counts. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and the…
Read MoreAMERICAN CONST. CO. v. JACKSONVILLE T. & K. W. R. CO.(1893)
No. 14 Argued: Decided: March 27, 1893 Statement by Mr. Justice GRAY: These was two petitions to this court, each…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1893)
No. 969 Argued: Decided: December 4, 1893 Statement by Mr. Chief Justice FULLER. Alexander Allen was indicted at the November…
Read MoreALEXANDRE v. MACHAN(1893)
No. 61 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1893 Statement by Mr. Justice BROWN. This was a libel by the owners of…
Read MoreALBUQUERQUE NAT BANK v. PEREA(1893)
No. 710 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1893 In equity. Suit by the Albuquerque National Bank against Jose L. Perea, sheriff…
Read More
