No. 180 Argued: Decided: February 28, 1898 The defendant in error, who was the plaintiff below, brought this action in…
Read MoreBARROW S.S. CO. v. KANE(1898)
No. 353 Argued: Decided: April 11, 1898 This was an action brought November 1, 1894, in the circuit court of…
Read MoreBAKER v. WALTER BAKER & CO.(1898)
No. 534 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1898 Holmes Conrad and R. T. Barton, for petitioner. George Putnam, for respondent. No…
Read MoreBAKER v. GRICE(1898)
No. 336 Argued: Decided: February 21, 1898 The petition for the writ was filed on the 9th of December, 1896,…
Read MoreBAKER v. CUMMINGS(1898)
No. 189 Argued: Decided: February 21, 1898 This suit was commenced by appellee, Cummings, on February 1, 1890, by a…
Read MoreBACKUS v. FORT ST. UNION DEPOT CO.(1898)
No. 55 Argued: Decided: March 7, 1898 The constitution of Michigan provides: Article 15, 9: ‘The property of no person…
Read MoreANDERSEN v. U S(1898)
No. 583 Argued: Decided: May 9, 1898 The indictment charged that Andersen, ‘on the 6th day of August, in the…
Read MoreANDERSEN v. TREAT(1898)
No. 415 Argued: Decided: November 14, 1898 John Andersen was indicted in the circuit court of the United States for…
Read MoreAMERICAN SURETY CO v. PAULY(1898)
No. 169 Argued: Decided: April 18, 1898 Edward Winslow Paige, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion…
Read MoreAMERICAN SUR CO OF NEW YORK v. PAULY(1898)
No. 168 Argued: Decided: April 18, 1898 Edward Winslow Paige, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion…
Read MoreWESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. TAGGART(1896)
No. 662 Argued: Decided: May 18, 1896 That the ‘portion of said telegraphic plant situated within said state of Indiana…
Read MoreWILSON v. KIESEL(1896)
No. 139 Argued: Decided: November 30, 1896 Ogden Hiles, for appellant. Abbot R. Heywood, for appellees. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER…
Read MoreFALLBROOK IRRIGATION DIST v. BRADLEY(1896)
No. 355 Argued: Decided: November 16, 1896 This is an appeal from the United States circuit court for the Southern…
Read MoreBALL v. HALSELL(1896)
No. 471 Argued: Decided: March 2, 1896 J. G. Halsell.’ The signature of the contract was admitted. The other material…
Read MoreANDREWS v. U S(1896)
No. 532 Argued: Decided: April 13, 1896 This case is here upon a writ of error sued out of the…
Read MoreAMERICAN ROAD-MACH CO v. PENNOCK & SHARP CO(1896)
No. 27 Argued: Decided: October 19, 1896 F. P. Fish, for appellant. L. L. Bond, for appellees. Mr. Chief Justice…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1896)
No. 371 Argued: Decided: December 7, 1896 Mr. Justice BROWN delivered the opinion of the court. This was a writ…
Read MoreALBERTY v. U S(1896)
No. 853 Argued: Decided: April 20, 1896 Defendant, a Cherokee negro, who was known both by his father’s name of…
Read MoreAINSA v. U. S.(1896)
No. 429 Argued: Decided: March 2, 1896 This was a proceeding on behalf of the United States, instituted by direction…
Read MoreACERS v. U S(1896)
No. 393 Argued: Decided: November 30, 1896 Asst. Atty. Gen. Dickinson, for the United States. Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the…
Read More
