LawCare Nigeria

Nigeria Legal Information & Law Reports

ABIODUN V. ODEDIRAN v. THE STATE(2006)

ABIODUN V. ODEDIRAN v. THE STATE

In The Supreme Court of Nigeria

On Thursday, the 16th day of November, 2006

SC.282/2005

RATIO

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: WHAT IS THE STATUS OF AN ACCUSED PERSON CONVICTED OF MURDER 

There is an automatic constitutional right of appeal for an accused person convicted of murder to this court. PER OGBUAGU, J.S.C.

 

JUSTICES

ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-ALU    Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria

GEORGE ADESOLA OGUNTADE    Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria

ALOMA MARIAM MUKHTAR    Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria

MAHMUD MOHAMMED    Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria

IKECHI FRANCIS OGBUAGU    Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria

Between

 

ABIODUN V.ODEDIRAN  Appellant(s)

AND

THE STATE  Respondent(s)

 

KATSINA-ALU, J.S.C. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): Appellant had been convicted and sentenced on the offence of murder. The Constitution of Nigeria guarantees to the appellant an automatic right of appeal up to the Supreme Court. The record before us shows that this appeal was dismissed by the court below for want of diligent prosecution.
It seems to me that the court below in the circumstance had the duty to appoint counsel for the appellant to prosecute the appeal, if counsel who brought the appeal had been dilatory. This is the only method in my view, to give true effect to the constitutional provision guaranteeing automatic right of appeal.
I am satisfied that the court below was in error to have peremptorily dismissed the appeal. In the final conclusion, appeal is allowed. The order dismissing the appeal is set aside. It is directed that the appeal be heard by another panel of the court below.

OGUNTADE, J.S.C.: This appeal was improperly dismissed this being an appeal on the offence of murder. The appellant’s automatic right of appeal under the Constitution is rendered useless if his appeal can be so casually dismissed. The appeal is allowed. The order dismissing the appeal is set aside. It is directed that the appeal be heard afresh by another panel of the court below.

MUKHTAR, J.S.C.: Appeal allowed. The conviction and sentence is that of murder which carries ultimate punishment. Matter returned to the court below.

MOHAMMED, J.S.C.: The appeal is allowed as the appellant who was sentenced to death for murder had not have his appeal heard at court below. The appeal shall be heard by another panel of Court of Appeal.

OGBUAGU, J.S.C.: This is a murder case. There is an automatic constitutional right of appeal for an accused person convicted of murder to this court. The court below was therefore, with respect, not justified to have dismissed the appeal as it did at page 143 of the records.
The court therefore, allows the appeal and orders that the appeal be remitted back to the court below, to hear the appeal on its merits by another panel.

Appeal allowed.

 

Appearances

Oladipo Okpeseyi, Esq. (with him, Emeka Okpala, Esq.) For Appellant

 

AND

Laide Olayinka (Mrs.), Solicitor-General, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Lagos State (with her, M.O. Asumah [Mrs.], Chief State Counsel, Ministry of Justice, Lagos State) For Respondent