David Mathie, Appellant.— Abercromby v. Robert Muir, Respondent.— ShadwellMarch 12. 1824. Lord Alloway. Subject_Title to Pursue — Guarantee —Fraud. —…
Read MoreCharles Fraser, Esq V Francis Maitland
Charles Fraser, Esq. Appellant.—Moncreiff—Skene v. Francis Maitland, Respondent.—Gordon—BuchananMarch 9. 1824. Lord Alloway. Subject_Landlord and Tenant — Singular Successor — Judicial…
Read MoreYoung V William Muir
Young, Ross, Richardson and Company, Appellants. Adam—John Campbell v. William Muir, Trustee of James Auchie and Company, Respondent.—Stephen—WhighamMarch 2. 1824.…
Read MoreWilliam Taylor V James Kerr
William Taylor, Appellant.—Brougham v. James Kerr, Respondent.—JamesonMarch 9. 1824. Subject_Bankrupt — Sequestration. — An appeal dismissed against an order in…
Read MoreEarl of Wemyss and March V Sir J. Montgomery
Earl of Wemyss and March, Appellant.—Sugden—Jeffrey v. Sir J. Montgomery, of Stanhope, Bart. Respondent.—Moncreiff—AbercrombyFeb. 25. 1824. Lord Gillies. Subject_Entail —…
Read MoreWalter Learmonth and Company V John Livingstone and his Factor loco Tutoris
Walter Learmonth and Company, Appellants.—Copley—Pemberton v. John Livingstone and his Factor loco Tutoris, Respondents.—Bell—M’NeillJuly 2. 1823. Lord Robertson. Subject_Partnership. —…
Read MoreThomas Dunlop douglas, Esq. V Sir James Colquhoun
Thomas Dunlop douglas, Esq. Appllent.—Skene v. Sir James Colquhoun, Respondent.—ForsythJuly 16. 1823. Subject_Freehold Qualification — Member of Parliament — Retour.…
Read MoreSir James Duff V Earl of Fife
Sir James Duff, Appellant.—Warren—Thomson—Moncreiff v. Earl of Fife, Respondent.—Gifford—Clerk—Cranstoun—Jeffrey—Murray—CockburnJuly 17. 1823. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Title to Pursue — Writ — Slat.…
Read MoreEarl of Seafield and Curator V Sir George Abercromby
Earl of Seafield and Curator, Appellants.—Gifford—Corbet—Mackenzie v. Sir George Abercromby, Respondent.—Connell—HopeJuly 16. 1823. Lord Reston and Cringletie. Subject_Teinds — Allocation…
Read MoreArch. Stirling, Esq. V Claud Alexander, Esq.
Arch. Stirling, Esq. Appellant.—Fullerton—Shaw Stewart v. Claud Alexander, Esq. Respondent.—Gifford—ForsythJuly 2. 1823. Subject_Freehold Qualification — Member of Parliament. — Circumstances…
Read MoreWilliam White V Robert Ballantyne of Phaap
William White, Appellant.—Clerk—Cockburn v. Robert Ballantyne of Phaap, Respondent.—Warren—AbercrombyJune 20. 1823. Lords Balgray and Cringletie. Subject_Facility — Fraud — Reduction.…
Read MoreSir William Rae and Others V James Gibson-Craig, Esq
Sir William Rae and Others, Petitioners.—Gifford v. James Gibson-Craig, Esq. Respondent.—BroughamJune 20. 1823. Subject_Jury Court — Stat. 55th Geo. III.…
Read MoreGeorge Reid V Jean Laing, Respondent.
George Reid, Appellant.—Wetherell—Lushington—Fullerton v. Jean Laing, Respondent.—Gifford—Forsyth—MoncreiffMay 14. 1823. Lord Robertson. Subject_Marriage — Proof. — Circumstances under which it was…
Read MoreCharles Ferrier, (George Lyell’s Trustee,) V James Mudie and James Ford
Charles Ferrier, (George Lyell’s Trustee,) Appellant.—Gifford—Clerk—Bell v. James Mudie and James Ford, Respondents.—Cranstoun—JamesonJune 9. 1823. Subject_Sale — Latent Burden. —…
Read MoreAndrew Gordon V A. Bogle, for the Royal Bank of Scotland
Andrew Gordon, Appellant.—Jeffrey—More v. A. Bogle, for the Royal Bank of Scotland, RespondentJune 4. 1823. Subject_Property — Statute 57. Geo.…
Read MoreAdam Hunter V Right Hon. Elizabeth Hunter of Polmood
Adam Hunter, Appellant v. Right Hon. Elizabeth Hunter of Polmood, and Husband, Respondents.—Gifford—ForbesJune 9. 1823. Lord Robertson. Subject_Service. — Held,…
Read MoreWilliam Stirling and Sons V John Duncan Junior and Company
William Stirling and Sons, Appellants.—Gifford—Clerk—Skene—Gillies v. John Duncan Junior and Company, Respondents.—Moncreiff—WilsonMarch 5. 1823. Lord Gillies. Subject_Sale — Lien —…
Read MoreThos. Graham V Jas. Graham
Thos. Graham, Appellant.—Gifford—Wedderburn—Alison v. Jas. Graham, Respondent.—Warren—Sugden—RobertsonMarch 5. 1823. Lord Craigie. Subject_Mutual Contract. — An estate having been left to…
Read MoreRev. Robert Scott V Charles MAcdonald and Others
Rev. Robert Scott, Appellant.—Jeffrey—H. Lumsden v. Charles MAcdonald and Others, RespondentsMarch 5. 1823. Subject_Cessio. — Circumstances under which it was…
Read MoreMiss Jane Ferguson, and Robert Ferguson, Esq. V Hugh Andrew Johnstone Munro
Miss Jane Ferguson, and Robert Ferguson, Esq. Appellants—Clerk—C. Ross—Moncreiff—Hope v. Hugh Andrew Johnstone Munro, Respondent—Warren—MackenzieMarch 5. 1823. Lords Meadowbank and…
Read More
