Arch. M’Phail, (a Pauper), Appellant.—Murray—Heath v. William Glennie, (a Pauper), Respondent.—WilsonMay 11. 1829. Lords Alloway and Eldin. Subject_Implied Obligation —…
Read MoreArchibald Speirs, and Others v Houston’s Executors, and Oliver Vile, Houston’s Assignee
Archibald Speirs, and Others, Appellants and Respondents v. Houston’s Executors, and Oliver Vile, Houston’s Assignee, Respondents and AppellantsMay 22. 1829.…
Read MoreAlexander Ritchie v John Mackay
Alexander Ritchie, Appellant.—Lushington—Hunter v. John Mackay, Respondent.—Spankie—NapierJune 24. 1829. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Bill of Exchange. — Oath. — The Court of…
Read MoreAlexander and William Malcolms v Thomas Young
Alexander and William Malcolms, Appellants. T. H. Miller—Rodger v. Thomas Young, RespondentJune 5. 1829. Lord Eldin. Subject_Lease — Assignation —…
Read MoreWilliam Spence v Alexander Ross
William Spence, Appellant v. Alexander Ross, Respondent.—Lushington—IvoryMarch 25. 1829. Lord Mackenzie. Subject_Locus Pœnitentiæ — Absolute or Revocable — Fiar. —…
Read MoreLeitch and Others v Leitch’s Trustees
Leitch and Others, Appellants.—Adam—Stuart v. Leitch’s Trustees, Respondents.—Sugden—John CampbellFeb. 17. 1829. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Fee, Conditional or Absolute. — A party…
Read MoreWilliam Eaton and Hugh Cowan v Alexander Murdoch
William Eaton and Hugh Cowan, Appellants. John Campbell—Fullerton—Keay v. Alexander Murdoch, Curator Bonis to John and Robert Watsons, Respondent.—Adam—SandfordJuly 4.…
Read MoreThomas Harvie of Westthorn v George Rodgers
Thomas Harvie of Westthorn, Appellant.—Dean of Faculty Moncreiff—Brougham v. George Rodgers, and Others, Respondents.—Adam—KeayJuly 8. 1828. Jury Court. Subject_Prescription —…
Read MoreSir Neil Menzies of Menzies v Earl of Breadalbane and Holland
Sir Neil Menzies of Menzies, Bart. Appellant. D. of Fac. Moncreiff v. Earl of Breadalbane and Holland, Respondent. Sol.-Gen. Tindal—KeayJuly…
Read MoreSir Hugh Munro, Bart v George Munro, and Others
July 25. 1828. Lord Eldin. Subject_Entail. — Held, (affirming the judgment of the Court of Session), 1. That the omission…
Read MoreSir Hugh Munro v George Munro
Sir Hugh Munro, Bart., Appellant.—D. of Fac. Moncreiff—Sugden v. George Munro, and Others, Respondents.—Brougham—KeayJuly 25. 1828. Lord Eldin. Subject_Entail. —…
Read MoreJohn Crichton, Esq v Elizabeth Grierson and Others
John Crichton, Esq. Appellant and Respondent. Dean of Fac. Moncreiff—Sugden—Whigham v. Elizabeth Grierson and Others, Respondents and Appellants. Brougham—Fullerton—KeayJuly 25.…
Read MoreJ. M’Culloch, and Others v Sir Alexander Muir M’Kenzie, Bart
J. M’Culloch, and Others, Appellants.—Adam—Greenshields—Pyper v. Sir Alexander Muir M’Kenzie, Bart. Respondent. Sol. Gen. Tindal—A. Bell—KeayJuly 28. 1828. Lord Cringletie.…
Read MoreJames Bryce v Walter Graham
James Bryce, John Dickson, and Others, Appellants v. Walter Graham, RespondentJuly 23. 1828. Subject_Idiotry and Furiosity — Interdiction — Expenses…
Read MoreManners and Miller, v The King’s Printers
Manners and Miller, and Others, Appellants. Dr Lushington—Keay v. The King’s Printers, (Sir D. Blair, and Others), Respondents. Sugden—A. BellG.…
Read MoreExecutrix of John Vans Agnew v Earl of Stair, and Others
Executrix of John Vans Agnew, of Sheuchan, Appellant and Respondent.—Adam—Pyper v. Earl of Stair, and Others, Respondents and Appellants. Sol.-Gen.…
Read MoreEarl of Kintore and Others v J. Forbes and Others
Earl of Kintore and Others, Appellants.—John Campbell—Keay v. J. Forbes and Others, Respondents.—Spankie—Adam—LumsdenJuly 11. 1828. Lord Mackenzie. Subject_Salmon Fishing —…
Read MoreCommercial Banking Company of Scotland v Pollock’s Trustees
Commercial Banking Company of Scotland, and Others, Appellants v. Pollock’s Trustees, &c. RespondentsJuly 28. 1828. Subject_Title to Pursue — Process.…
Read MoreWilliam Burridge Cabbell v James Brock
William Burridge Cabbell, Cashier to the Glasgow Bank Company, Appellant.—Bosanquet—Spankie—Fullerton v. James Brock, (Newbigging and Company’s Trustee), Respondent.—Sol.-Gen. Hope—Adam—T. H.…
Read MoreMary Black M’Neill v Malcolm M’Gregor
Mary Black M’Neill, or Jolly, Spouse of Robert Jolly, Appellant.—King’s Advocate (Dr Jenner)—Brougham—T. H. Miller—Wilson v. Malcolm M’Gregor, Respondent.—Lushington—KeayJune 20.…
Read More
