Thomas Harvie of Westthorn, Appellant.—Dean of Faculty Moncreiff—Brougham v. George Rodgers, and Others, Respondents.—Adam—KeayJuly 8. 1828. Jury Court. Subject_Prescription —…
Read MoreSir Neil Menzies of Menzies v Earl of Breadalbane and Holland
Sir Neil Menzies of Menzies, Bart. Appellant. D. of Fac. Moncreiff v. Earl of Breadalbane and Holland, Respondent. Sol.-Gen. Tindal—KeayJuly…
Read MoreSir Hugh Munro, Bart v George Munro, and Others
July 25. 1828. Lord Eldin. Subject_Entail. — Held, (affirming the judgment of the Court of Session), 1. That the omission…
Read MoreSir Hugh Munro v George Munro
Sir Hugh Munro, Bart., Appellant.—D. of Fac. Moncreiff—Sugden v. George Munro, and Others, Respondents.—Brougham—KeayJuly 25. 1828. Lord Eldin. Subject_Entail. —…
Read MoreJohn Crichton, Esq v Elizabeth Grierson and Others
John Crichton, Esq. Appellant and Respondent. Dean of Fac. Moncreiff—Sugden—Whigham v. Elizabeth Grierson and Others, Respondents and Appellants. Brougham—Fullerton—KeayJuly 25.…
Read MoreJ. M’Culloch, and Others v Sir Alexander Muir M’Kenzie, Bart
J. M’Culloch, and Others, Appellants.—Adam—Greenshields—Pyper v. Sir Alexander Muir M’Kenzie, Bart. Respondent. Sol. Gen. Tindal—A. Bell—KeayJuly 28. 1828. Lord Cringletie.…
Read MoreJames Bryce v Walter Graham
James Bryce, John Dickson, and Others, Appellants v. Walter Graham, RespondentJuly 23. 1828. Subject_Idiotry and Furiosity — Interdiction — Expenses…
Read MoreManners and Miller, v The King’s Printers
Manners and Miller, and Others, Appellants. Dr Lushington—Keay v. The King’s Printers, (Sir D. Blair, and Others), Respondents. Sugden—A. BellG.…
Read MoreExecutrix of John Vans Agnew v Earl of Stair, and Others
Executrix of John Vans Agnew, of Sheuchan, Appellant and Respondent.—Adam—Pyper v. Earl of Stair, and Others, Respondents and Appellants. Sol.-Gen.…
Read MoreEarl of Kintore and Others v J. Forbes and Others
Earl of Kintore and Others, Appellants.—John Campbell—Keay v. J. Forbes and Others, Respondents.—Spankie—Adam—LumsdenJuly 11. 1828. Lord Mackenzie. Subject_Salmon Fishing —…
Read MoreCommercial Banking Company of Scotland v Pollock’s Trustees
Commercial Banking Company of Scotland, and Others, Appellants v. Pollock’s Trustees, &c. RespondentsJuly 28. 1828. Subject_Title to Pursue — Process.…
Read MoreWilliam Burridge Cabbell v James Brock
William Burridge Cabbell, Cashier to the Glasgow Bank Company, Appellant.—Bosanquet—Spankie—Fullerton v. James Brock, (Newbigging and Company’s Trustee), Respondent.—Sol.-Gen. Hope—Adam—T. H.…
Read MoreMary Black M’Neill v Malcolm M’Gregor
Mary Black M’Neill, or Jolly, Spouse of Robert Jolly, Appellant.—King’s Advocate (Dr Jenner)—Brougham—T. H. Miller—Wilson v. Malcolm M’Gregor, Respondent.—Lushington—KeayJune 20.…
Read MoreJohn Wilson and Others v Sir William Francis Eliott
John Wilson and Others, Appellants.—Shadwell—Adam v. Sir William Francis Eliott of Stobs and Wells, Respondent.—Spankie—Brougham Et e contra.May 2. 1828.…
Read MoreIncorporation of Fleshers of Glasgow v Christian Nelson or Scotland
Incorporation of Fleshers of Glasgow, Appellants. Solicitor-General Tindal—Fullerton v. Christian Nelson or Scotland, Respondent. Keay—T. H. MillerEt e Contra. June…
Read MoreAlbion Fire and Life Insurance Company v William Mills, and Others
Albion Fire and Life Insurance Company, Appellants. Solicitor-General Tindal—Scarlett v. William Mills, and Others, Respondents.—Adam—BroughamJune 27. 1828. Lord M’Kenzie, and…
Read MoreAnna Maria Graham or Templer v The Reverend George Henry Templer
Anna Maria Graham or Templer, and Lady Montgomerie, Appellants.—Adam—Wilson v. The Reverend George Henry Templer, and Others, Respondents.—Sugden—KeayApril 1. 1828.…
Read MorePoor Isobel M’Diarmid and Husband v John and James M’Diarmid
Poor Isobel M’Diarmid and Husband, Appellants. Fullerton—Wilson—Bere v. John and James M’Diarmid, Respondents. Keay—T. H. MillerMarch 28. 1828. Lord Eldin.…
Read MoreStrachan and Gavin v G. Paton and Others
Strachan and Gavin, Appellants.—Sol.-Gen. Tindal—John Campbell v. G. Paton and Others, Respondents.—Lushington—KeayFeb. 22. 1828. Lord Meadowbank. Subject_Mutual Contract — Reparation…
Read MoreColonel Gordon of Cluny v John Anderson
Colonel Gordon of Cluny, Appellant.—Wilson—Wright—Pyper v. John Anderson, Respondent.—Keay—T. H. Miller Et e contra.Feb. 15. 1828. Lord Alloway. Subject_Tack —…
Read More
