Edinburgh, Perth, and Dundee Railway Company, Appellants v. Philip, Respondent1857. Feb. 19th, 20th, and 23rd. Subject_Railway Company — Liability to…
Read MoreThe Edinburgh, Perth, and Dundee Railway Company v Robert Philip
The Edinburgh, Perth, and Dundee Railway Company, Appellants v. Robert Philip, RespondentFEBRUARY 23, 1857. Subject_Agreement — Contingent Obligation — Construction…
Read MoreMcEwan v Campbell Et Al
McEwan, Appellant v. Campbell Et Al Respondents1857. 17th and 19th February. Subject_Pleading — Pailway — Provisional Committee — Obligation —…
Read MoreWilliam M’Ewan v Sir James Campbell and Others
William M’Ewan, Appellant v. Sir James Campbell and Others, RespondentsFEBRUARY 19, 1857. Subject_Railway — Copartnery — Provisional Committee — Obligation,…
Read MoreCochrane Et Al. v Baillie
Cochrane Et Al., Appellants v. Baillie, Respondent (a)1857. 9th, 10th, and 12th March. Subject_Entail, Deed constituting. — A charter of…
Read MoreConstance M. E. Cochrane and Amy A. F. A. Cochrane, &c. v Alexander Dundas Ross
Constance M. E. Cochrane and Amy A. F. A. Cochrane, &c., Appellants v. Alexander Dundas Ross Cochrane Wisheart Baillie, RespondentMARCH…
Read MoreMartin Et Al. v Kelso Et Al.
Martin Et Al., Appellants v. Kelso Et Al., Respondents1857. Feb. 24th, 26th, 27th. March 21st. Subject_Construction. — Entail. — Execution…
Read MoreWilliam Kelso Martin, &c. v Eleanora Kelso and Others
William Kelso Martin, &c., Appellants v. Eleanora Kelso and Others, RespondentsMARCH 20, 1857. Subject_Entail — Construction — Destination — Power…
Read MoreThe Caledonian Railway Company v Lord Belhaven and Others
The Caledonian Railway Company, Appellants v. Lord Belhaven and Others, Trustees of the deceased John Wilson of Dundy van, RespondentsJUNE…
Read MoreCaledonian Railway Company v Lord Belhaven et al.
Caledonian Railway Company, Appellants v. Lord Belhaven et al., Respondents1857. May 28th, June 5th. Subject_Minerals under a Railway — Security…
Read MoreDempster v Dempster
Dempster, Appellant v. Dempster, Respondent1857. June 12th. Subject_Entail. — Lord Rutherfurd’s Act. — An entail defective in any one of…
Read MorePeddie v Brown et al.
Peddie, Appellant v. Brown et al., Respondents1857. June 9th. Subject_Res inter alios. — Circumstances under which it was held, (affirming…
Read MoreD. S. Peddie v Messrs. Brown, Gordon, and Co.
D. S. Peddie, Appellant v. Messrs. Brown, Gordon, and Co., RespondentsJUNE 11, 1857. Subject_Lease — Colliery — Railway — Jus…
Read MoreWhite v Dempster
White, Appellant v. Dempster, RespondentJUNE 12, 1857. Subject_Entail — Fetters — Erasure — Reduction — Act 1685; Stat. 11 and…
Read MoreArchibald Finnie v The Glasgow and South Western Railway Co
Archibald Finnie, Appellant v. The Glasgow and South Western Railway Co., Respondents. (No. 2.)AUGUST 13, 1857. Subject_Railway Lease — Contract…
Read MoreFinnie v Glasgow and South-Western Railway Company
Finnie, Appellant v. Glasgow and South-Western Railway Company, Respondents1857. August 3rd, 4th, and 13th. Subject_Railway Tolls — Agreement. — Circumstances…
Read MoreDEBATE ON THE INQUIRY INTO THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT OF PARLIAMENT
DEBATE ON THE INQUIRY INTO THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE HIGH COURT OF PARLIAMENT. On the 28th February 1856. Earl…
Read MoreFarwell v Boston and Worcester Railroad Corporation (4 Metcalf, 49).
Farwell v. Boston and Worcester Railroad Corporation (4 Metcalf, 49).1856. Where a master uses due dilligence in the selection of…
Read MoreDixon et al. v Bovill
Dixon et al., Appellants v. Bovill, Respondent1856. May 30th, June 2nd, 3rd, July 29th. Subject_Iron Scrip Notes, Character of. —…
Read MoreMackenzie v Dunlop
Mackenzie, Appellant v. Dunlop, Respondents1856. June 3rd, 5th, July 29th. Mercantile Usage is proveable by the multiplication or congregation of…
Read More
