No. 51 Argued: October 20, 1902Decided: February 23, 1903 On January 23, 1899, the petitioner, the owner of certain notes…
Read MoreCITY OF OWENSBORO v. OWENSBORO WATERWORKS CO(1903)
No. 58 Argued: Decided: November 30, 1903 This is a bill in equity to enjoin the city of Owensboro, Kentucky,…
Read MoreBLACKFEATHER v. U S(1903)
No. 276 Argued: Decided: June 1, 1903 Messrs. John C. Chaney and Alphonso Hart for appellant. Assistant Attorney General Pradt…
Read MoreBILLINGS v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF ILLINOIS(1903)
No. 106 Argued: Decided: January 19, 1903 Messrs. James F. Meagher and William D. Guthrie, for plaintiffs in error. Mr.…
Read MoreBIGBY v. UNITED STATES(1903)
No. 111 Argued: Decided: February 23, 1903 Bigby, the plaintiff in error, claimed in his petition to have been damaged…
Read MoreBELL v. COM. TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST CO.(1903)
No. 191 Argued: Decided: April 6, 1903 By 828, Rev. Stat. (U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 635), clerks of…
Read MoreBEASLEY v. TEXAS & P R CO(1903)
No. 79 Argued: Decided: December 14, 1903 Messrs. E. B. Kruttschnitt and W. P. Hall for appellants. Messrs. John F.…
Read MoreBEALS v. CONE(1903)
No. 84 Argued: Decided: January 26, 1903 This is what is known in the mining regions as an ‘adverse suit,’…
Read MoreBALTIMORE & P R CO v. LANDRIGAN(1903)
No. 71 Argued: Decided: December 7, 1903 This action was brought under the death statute of the District of Columbia…
Read MoreATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEL. CO. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA(1903)
No. 163 Argued: February 24, 1903Decided: June 1, 1903 Messrs. John F. Dillon, H. B. Gill, Silas W. Pettit, George…
Read MoreATKIN v. STATE OF KANSAS(1903)
No. 30 Argued: Decided: November 30, 1903 This case involves the validity under the Constitution of the United States of…
Read MoreARBUCKLE v. BLACKBURN(1903)
No. 66 Argued: November 10, 1903Decided: December 7, 1903 This was a bill filed by Arbuckle Brothers against Joseph E.…
Read MoreANGLO-AMERICAN PROVISION CO v. DAVIS PROVISION CO(1903)
No. 63 Argued: November 9, 1903Decided: November 30, 1903 Mr. Henry Wilson Bridges for appellant. Messrs. Frank E. Smith and…
Read MoreANDREWS v. ANDREWS(1903)
No. 23 Argued: February 28, 1902Decided: January 19, 1903 The plaintiff and the defendant in error, each claiming to be…
Read MoreAMERICAN ICE CO v. EASTERN TRUST & BANKING CO(1903)
No. 95 Argued: December 2, 1902Decided: February 23, 1903 The appellee herein was the complainant in the court of original…
Read MoreAMERICAN COLORTYPE CO v. CONTINENTAL COLORTYPE CO(1903)
No. 440 Argued: Decided: January 19, 1903 Messrs. A. M. Pence, Otto C. Butz, Amos C. Miller, and Messrs. Lackner,…
Read MoreALLEN v. PULLMAN’S PALACE CAR CO.(1903)
No. 27 Argued: October 16, 1903Decided: November 16, 1903 This is a writ of error to review the judgment of…
Read MoreWOODWORTH v. NORTHWESTERN MUT LIFE INS CO(1902)
No. 222 Argued: April 16, 1902Decided: May 5, 1902 The question arising for decision in this cause is embodied in…
Read MoreWILSON v. ISEMINGER(1902)
No. 193 Argued: March 19, 1902Decided: April 7, 1902 This was an action of assumpsit brought December, 1896, in the…
Read MoreWARD v. JOSLIN(1902)
No. 245 Argued: April 30, 1902Decided: May 19, 1902 September 12, 1888, S. S. Hite and Mary L. Hite executed…
Read More
