No. 136 Argued: January 18, 1905Decided: February 20, 1905 Somewhat condensing the facts below found, they are as follows: In…
Read MoreALLEN v. ALLEGHANY CO(1905)
No. 119 Argued: January 11, 1905Decided: February 20, 1905 This was a suit begun in the supreme court of New…
Read MoreU S v. CROSLEY(1905)
No. 96 Argued: Decided: January 23, 1905 This case was tried in the court of claims upon a petition filed…
Read MoreU S v. CADARR(1905)
No. 438 Argued: Decided: April 3, 1905 Assistant Attorney General McReynolds and Mr. William R. Harr for petitioner. Mr. H.…
Read MoreALEXANDER v. CROLLOTT(1905)
No. 118 Argued: Decided: December 18, 1905 Mr. Neill B. Field for appellant. Mr. William B. Childers for appellee. Statement…
Read MoreAH SIN v. WITTMAN(1905)
No. 245 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1905 Mr. George D. Collins for plaintiff in error. Messrs. L. F. Byington and…
Read MoreADAMS EXP CO v. STATE OF IOWA(1905)
No. 82 Argued: December 2, 1904Decided: January 3, 1905 Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles W.…
Read MoreBARNEY v. CITY OF NEW YORK(1904)
No. 159 Argued: Decided: March 21, 1904 This was a bill to enjoin the city of New York, the board…
Read MoreBANKERS’ MUT CASUALTY CO v. MINNEAPOLIS, ST P & S S M R CO.(1904)
No. 141 Argued: Decided: February 23, 1904 This action was originally brought in the circuit court of the United States…
Read MoreBALTIMORE SHIPBUILDING & DRY DOCK CO. v. CITY OF BALTIMORE(1904)
No. 39 Argued: Decided: November 28, 1904 Messrs. E. P. Keech, Jr., Leon E. Greenbaum, and Archibald H. Taylor for…
Read MoreBACHE v. HUNT(1904)
No. 177 Argued: Decided: April 4, 1904 Mr. F. Spiegelberg for appellant. Messrs. Adrian H. Joline and Clarence Brown for…
Read MoreAMERICAN STEEL & WIRE CO. v. SPEED(1904)
No. 356 Argued: Decided: February 23, 1904 Mr. Josiah Patterson and Messrs. Paterson, Neely, & Henderson, and Pam, Calhoun, &…
Read MoreAMADO v. U S(1904)
No. 33 Argued: Decided: November 7, 1904 Assistant Attorney General Purdy for defendant in error. Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the…
Read MoreAIKENS v. STATE OF WISCONSIN(1904)
Argued: Decided: November 7, 1904 Messrs. W. H. Timlin and George D. Van Dyke for plaintiff in error in Nos.…
Read MoreAH HOW v. U S(1904)
No. 307 Argued: January 12, 1904Decided: February 23, 1904 Messrs. Terence J. McManus, Frank S. Black, Russell H. Landale, and…
Read MoreADAMS v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK(1904)
No. 504 Argued: January 27, 1904Decided: February 23, 1904 This is a writ of error to the supreme court of…
Read MoreADAMS v. CHURCH(1904)
No. 169 Argued: March 3, 1904Decided: March 21, 1904 This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court…
Read MoreDUNBAR v. DUNBAR(1903)
No. 244 Argued: April 16, 1903Decided: June 1, 1903 The defendant in error, being the plaintiff below, brought her action…
Read MoreDEFIANCE WATER CO v. CITY OF DEFIANCE(1903)
No. 21 Argued: April 22, 1903Decided: November 30, 1903 On the 4th day of January, 1898, the city of Defiance,…
Read MoreCLINTON E. WORDEN & CO. v. CALIFORNIA FIG SYRUP CO.(1903)
No. 36 Argued: Decided: January 5, 1903 On June 1, 1897, the California Fig Syrup Company, created under the laws…
Read More
