LawCare Nigeria

Nigeria Legal Information & Law Reports

Nigeria: Stop Blackmailing Supreme Court, Metuh Warns Anti-Graft Agency

Court restrains FG from auctioning 7 marginal fields

Former National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Olisa Metuh, has cautioned the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to allow the apex court the liberty to adjudicate on matters before it rather than blackmailing it for ulterior motives.

This is even as the PDP stalwart who recently returned from a medical trip to the United Kingdom, accused the anti-graft body of sponsoring publications in the media with the sole intent of influencing the highest court in his corruption trial.

In a statement made available to journalists yesterday, Metuh vowed to resist any attempt to pronounce his guilty before trial, adding that his ordeal is nothing short of persecution.

The statement read: “My attention has been drawn to publications sponsored by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, in a renewed media trial in my case, this time aimed at blackmailing and influencing the Supreme Court on the matter.

“Such media trial and agenda-setting by the EFCC compromised the processes at the High Court and led to a judgment that has been found to be overtly biased.

“I, therefore, wish to state, without any equivocation, that I will no longer allow a government agency created to chase criminals to continue to use me as a guinea pig for political persecution, particularly as we are now before the Supreme Court.

“I am aware that this attempt to blackmail and arm-twist the Supreme Court is being engineered by certain elements in the EFCC, who often whisper that they are acting on pressures from above. These same people had claimed that they were being threatened by the former Acting Chairman of the EFCC, Ibrahim Magu to use all means to silence me.

“The prosecution counsel, Mr Sylvanus Tahir from Gombe State, had boasted in open court on several occasions, but particularly on the last day of my cross-examination, that I will be sent to jail and no appeal can overturn the judgment.

“A cursory look at the judgment of the court of the first instance reveals importation of lies earlier peddled by the EFCC upon my arrest and outside of the courtroom and which were never presented as evidence in the course of the trial. It is quite revealing that such lies found themselves as the content of the judgment. Does it mean that the EFCC as part of writing the judgment read by the court?

“Since the quashing of the judgment of the trial court by the Court of Appeal, agents of the EFCC have been harassing and threatening me.