v.
Inglis or Breen and Another.
( Ante, May 31, 1887, vol. xxiv. p. 52; 14 R. 740.)Subject_Succession — Will — Election between Testamentary Provisions and Legitim — Essential Error. Headnote:
John Inglis junior appealed.
The case was opened, but their Lordships having expressed opinions unfavourable thereto, the appeal was withdrawn.
Counsel:
Counsel for the Appellant— Lord Advocate—Rigby, Q.C. Agents— Grahames, Currey, and Spens, for Webster, Will, & Ritchie, S.S.C.
Counsel for the Respondents— Asher, Q.C.—C. J. Guthrie. Agent— Andrew Beveridge, for H. B. & F. J. Dewar, W.S.
Source: https://www.bailii.org/
