No. 05-493 Argued: October 3, 2006Decided: November 13, 2006 In the penalty phase of respondent’s capital murder trial, he introduced…
Read MoreARLINGTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION v. MURPHY et vir.(2006)
No. 05-18 Argued: April 19, 2006Decided: June 26, 2006 After respondents prevailed in their Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)…
Read MoreARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al. v. AHLBORN(2006)
No. 04-1506 Argued: February 27, 2006Decided: May 1, 2006 Federal Medicaid law requires participating States to “ascertain the legal liability…
Read MoreARBAUGH v. Y & H CORP. dba THE MOONLIGHT CAFE(2006)
No. 04-944 Argued: January 11, 2006Decided: February 22, 2006 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it…
Read MoreANZA et al. v. IDEAL STEEL SUPPLY CORP.(2006)
No. 04-433 Argued: March 27, 2006Decided: June 5, 2006 The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) prohibits certain conduct…
Read MoreANTHONY ASH et al. v. TYSON FOODS, INC.(2006)
No. 05-379 Argued: Decided: February 21, 2006 Per Curiam. Petitioners Anthony Ash and John Hithon were superintendents at a poultry…
Read MoreALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MICHELLE THOMAS et al.(2006)
No. 05-552 Argued: Decided: April 17, 2006 Per Curiam. The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the Attorney General to grant…
Read MoreGONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. RAICH et al.(2005)
No. 03-1454 Argued: November 29, 2004Decided: June 6, 2005 California’s Compassionate Use Act authorizes limited marijuana use for medicinal purposes.…
Read MoreEXXON MOBIL CORP. v. ALLAPATTAH SERVICES, INC., et al.(2005)
No. 04-70 Argued: March 1, 2005Decided: June 23, 2005 In No. 04-70, Exxon dealers filed a class action against Exxon…
Read MoreEXXON MOBIL CORP. et al. v. SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORP.(2005)
No. 03-1696 Argued: February 23, 2005Decided: March 30, 2005 The Rooker-Feldman doctrine, at issue in this case, has been applied…
Read MoreDURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. v. BROUDO et al.(2005)
No. 03-932 Argued: January 12, 2005Decided: April 19, 2005 Respondents filed a securities fraud class action, alleging that petitioners, Dura…
Read MoreDORA B. SCHRIRO, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. ROBERT DOUGLAS SMITH(2005)
No. 04-1475 Argued: Decided: October 17, 2005 Per Curiam. In 1982, an Arizona jury convicted respondent Robert Douglas Smith of…
Read MoreDODD v. UNITED STATES(2005)
No. 04-5286 Argued: March 22, 2005 On April 4, 2001, petitioner Dodd filed a pro se motion under 28 U.…
Read MoreDECK v. MISSOURI(2005)
No. 04-5293 Argued: March 1, 2005Decided: May 23, 2005 Petitioner Deck was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death,…
Read MoreCUTTER et al. v. WILKINSON, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al.(2005)
No. 03-9877 Argued: March 21, 2005Decided: May 31, 2005 Section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act…
Read MoreCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BANKS(2005)
No. 03-892 Argued: November 1, 2004Decided: January 24, 2005 Respondent Banks settled his federal employment discrimination suit against a California…
Read MoreCLINGMAN, SECRETARY, OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD, et al. v. BEAVER et al.(2005)
No. 04-37 Argued: January 19, 2005Decided: May 23, 2005 Under Oklahoma’s semiclosed primary law, a political party may invite only…
Read MoreCLARK, FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, SEATTLE, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al. v. MARTINEZ(2005)
No. 03-878 Argued: October 13, 2004Decided: January 12, 2005 If an alien is found inadmissible and ordered removed, the Secretary…
Read MoreCITY OF SHERRILL, NEW YORK v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK et al.(2005)
No. 03-855 Argued: January 11, 2005Decided: March 29, 2005 Respondent Oneida Indian Nation of New York (OIN or Tribe) is…
Read MoreCITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES et al. v. ABRAMS(2005)
No. 03-1601 Argued: January 19, 2005Decided: March 22, 2005 After petitioner City denied respondent Abrams permission to construct a radio…
Read More
