No. 251 Argued: April 19, 1900Decided: May 14, 1900 John D. Scott executed in the District of Columbia, on April…
Read MoreCARTER v. STATE OF TEXAS(1900)
No. 193 Argued: Decided: April 16, 1900 Messrs. Wilford H. Smith and E. M. Hewlett for plaintiff in error. Mr.…
Read MoreCARTER v. ROBERTS(1900)
No. 570 Argued: Decided: April 23, 1900 Messrs. Abram J. Rose and Benjamin F. Tracy for Carter. Solicitor General Richards…
Read MoreCARMICHAEL v. EBERLE(1900)
No. 166 Argued: Decided: March 26, 1900 Messrs.William B. Childers and H. L. Pickett for plaintiffs in error and appellants.…
Read MoreCANADA SUGAR-REFINING CO v. INSURANCE CO OF NORTH AMERICA(1900)
No. 69 Argued: October 26, 1899Decided: January 8, 1900 The Canada Sugar Refining Company, a Canadian corporation, on November 27,…
Read MoreCARMICHAEL v. EBERLE(1900)
No. 166 Argued: Decided: March 26, 1900 Messrs.William B. Childers and H. L. Pickett for plaintiffs in error and appellants.…
Read MoreBANHOLZER v. NEW YORK LIFE INS CO(1900)
No. 277 Argued: Decided: May 28, 1900 This action was brought in the district court of the second judicial district…
Read MoreBALTIMORE & P R CO v. CUMBERLAND(1900)
No. 87 Argued: December 19, 1899Decided: February 5, 1900 This was an action begun in the supreme court of the…
Read MoreBALTIMORE & O S W R CO v. VOIGT(1900)
No. 88 Argued: Decided: February 26, 1900 The following statement and question were certified to this court by the judges…
Read MoreBALDWIN v. STATE OF MD.(1900)
No. 113 Argued: November 16, 1900Decided: December 3, 1900 The facts are these: Prior to 1880 certain residents of Maryland…
Read MoreBAGGS v. MARTIN(1900)
No. 205 Argued: Decided: December 3, 1900 This was a cause brought to this court on a certificate from the…
Read MoreBAEZ, EX PARTE(1900)
No. 88 Argued: Decided: April 12, 1900 On March 26 a motion was made for leave to file the following…
Read MoreAVERY v. POPPER(1900)
No. 72 Argued: Decided: December 3, 1900 This was an action originally instituted in the district court of Hunt county,…
Read MoreAUSTIN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE(1900)
No. 25 Argued: Decided: November 19, 1900 The facts are stated in the opinion. This was a writ of error…
Read MoreARNOLD v. HATCH(1900)
No. 183 Argued: March 14, 1900Decided: April 9, 1900 This was an intervening petition by the defendant in error, Lewis…
Read MoreAPACHE COUNTY v. BARTH(1900)
No. 181 Argued: Decided: April 30, 1900 In September, 1891, Jacob Barth commenced an action in one of the district…
Read MoreAMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO v. STATE OF LOUISIANA(1900)
No. 38 Argued: Decided: November 5, 1900 This was a petition filed in the civil district court for the parish…
Read MoreAMERICAN EXP CO v. MAYNARD(1900)
No. 220 Argued: November 9, 1899Decided: April 16, 1900 The Attorney General of the State of Michigan on the relation…
Read MoreALDRICH v. CHEMICAL NAT BANK(1900)
No. 58 Argued: October 20, 1899Decided: March 5, 1900 Messrs. F. W. Oldham and John W. Herron for appellant. Messrs.…
Read MoreADIRONDACK R CO v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK(1900)
No. 439 Argued: Decided: February 26, 1900 This is a writ of error to a judgment of the court of…
Read More
