Glasgow Corporation. (Before Lord Oranmore and Browne (Chairman), Earl of Malmesbury, J. D. Hope, M.P., and J. L. Sturrock, M.P.—at…
Read MoreGrant v. Kynoch [1919] UKHL 345 (07 April 1919)
Grant v. Kynoch.(In the Court of Session January 19, 1918, 55 S.L.R. 220, and 1918 S.C. 185.) Subject_Workmen’s Compensation —…
Read MoreCommercial Union Assurance Co., Ltd v. Waddell and Another [1919] UKHL 320 (04 April 1919)
Commercial Union Assurance Company, Limited v. Waddell and Another.(In the Court of Session June 22, 1917, 54 S.L.R. 497, and…
Read MoreM’Ellistram v. Ballymaceltigott Co-operative Agricultural and Dairy Society, Ltd [1919] UKHL 644 (24 March 1919)
M’Ellistram v. Ballymaceltigott Co-operative Agricultural and Dairy Society, Limited. Subject_Contract — Illegality — Restraint of Trade — Industrial and Provident…
Read MoreClarke v. Edinburgh and District Tramways Co., Ltd [1919] UKHL 303 (14 March 1919)
Clarke v. Edinburgh and District Tramways Company, Limited. Subject_Reparation — Negligence — Proof — Sufficiency of Evidence. Facts: Observations per…
Read MoreSellar v. Highland Railway Co. [1919] UKHL 216 (24 January 1919)
Sellar v. Highland Railway Company.(In the Court of Session, May 16, 1918, 55 S.L.R. 593, and July 19, 1918, 55…
Read MoreSellar v Highland Railway Co (No.1) [1919] UKHL 1 (24 January 1919)
Sellar v. Highland Railway Co. Lord Buckmaster.—So long ago as 1852 the House in the case of Dimes v. Proprietors…
Read MoreMalcolm v. Lockhart [1919] UKHL 224 (28 January 1919)
Malcolm v. Lockhart.(In the Court of Session, November 16, 1917, 55 S.L.R. 98.) Subject_Revenue — Income Tax — Stallion’s Fees…
Read MoreMalcolm v Lockhart (Surveyor of Taxes) [1919] UKHL TC_7_99 (28 January 1919)
Malcolm v Lockhart (Surveyor of Taxes) – UKHL TC_7_99 28 January 1919 Income Tax (Schedule D). A HTML version of…
Read MoreFried Krupp Aktiengessellschaft v. Orconera Iron Ore Co., Ltd [1919] UKHL 638 (31 January 1919)
Fried Krupp Aktiengessellschaft v. Orconera Iron Ore Company, Limited. Subject_Contract — Validity — Alien Enemy — Executory Contract with an…
Read MoreFerries v. Viscountess Cowdray [1919] UKHL 220 (27 January 1919)
Ferries v. Viscountess Cowdray.(In the Court of Session, February 5, 1918, 55 S.L.R. 261.) Subject_Landlord and Tenant — Arbitration —…
Read MoreCraig v. Corporation of Glasgow [1919] UKHL 186 (16 January 1919)
Craig v. Corporation of Glasgow. Subject_Reparation — Negligence — Proof — Sufficiency of Evidence — Incuria Dans Locum Injuriæ. Facts:…
Read MoreBaikie v. Glasgow Corporation [1919] UKHL 141 (17 January 1919)
Baikie v. Glasgow Corporation.(In the Court of Session, November 15. 1917, 55 S.L.R. 71.) Subject_Reparation — Negligence — Property —…
Read MoreBank Line Ltd v Arthur Capel & Co [1918] UKHL 1 (12 December 1918)
BANK LINE, LIMITED. APPELLANTS – v – ARTHUR CAPEL AND COMPANY RESPONDENTS The House took time for consideration. Dec. 12,…
Read MoreGlasgow and South-Western Railway (Ayr Harbour Transfer) [1918] UKHL 664 (04 October 1918)
Glasgow and South-Western Railway (Ayr Harbour Transfer). (Before the Earl of Wemyss (Chairman), Lord Southwark, Sir Henry Craik, M.P., and…
Read MoreDunfermline District Water [1918] UKHL 663_1 (03 October 1918)
Dunfermline District Water. (Before the Earl of Wemyss (Chairman), Lord Southwark, Sir Henry Craik, M.P., and Sir John M’Callum, M.P.—at…
Read MoreCowdenbeath Water Provisional Order [1918] UKHL 663 (01 October 1918)
Cowdenbeath Water Provisional Order. (Before the Earl of Wemyss (Chairman), Lord Southwark, Sir Henry Craik, M.P., and Sir John M’Callum,…
Read MoreCasdagli v. Casdagli [1918] UKHL 411 (28 October 1918)
Casdagli v. Casdagli. Subject_Foreign — Domicile — Extra — territoriality — Acquisition of Egyptian Domicile of Choice by a British…
Read MoreHood v. Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers), Ltd [1918] UKHL 605 (01 July 1918)
Hood v. Anchor Line (Henderson Brothers), Limited.(In the Court of Session, October 31, 1917, 55 S.L.R. 48.) Subject_Ship — Carriage…
Read MoreHood v Anchor Line (Henderson Bros) Ltd [1918] UKHL 2 (01 July 1918)
Hood v. Anchor Line. Lord Chancellor.—The appellant in this case sued the respondents for damages in respect of injuries sustained…
Read More
