Murdo M’Kenzie, Appellant—Moncreiff—Skene v. David Ross and his Curators, Respondents—Adam—Cockburn—MaitlandFeb. 15. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Jury Court — 55. Geo. III.…
Read MoreMurdo M’Kenzie V David Ross and his Curators
Murdo M’Kenzie, Appellant—Moncreiff—Skene v. David Ross and his Curators, Respondents—Adam—Cockburn—MaitlandFeb. 15. 1822. Lord Alloway. Subject_Proof — Jury Court — 55.…
Read MoreJean Humphry V James Aitken
Jean Humphry, Appellant—Jeffrey—Brownlee v. James Aitken, Respondent—Feb. 18. 1822. Lord Craigie. Subject_Proof — Semiplena Probatio — Bastard. — 1. —…
Read MoreW. and R. Russell and W. Moffat V Shannon, Stewart, and Company
W. and R. Russell and W. Moffat, Appellants.—Copley—Pollock v. Shannon, Stewart, and Company, Respondents.—Clerk—CuninghameJuly 27. 1821. Lord Gillies. Subject_Shipmaster —…
Read MoreSir James Montgomerie V Duke of Buccleuch
Sir James Montgomerie and Others, Executors of William Duke of Queensberry, Appellants.—Irvine—Cranstoun v. Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry and his…
Read MoreMrs. Nasmyth and Others V Dr. Hare and Others
Mrs. Nasmyth and Others, Appellants.—Scarlett—Lushingion v. Dr. Hare and Others, Respondents.—Romilly—MackenzieJuly 27. 1821. Lord Craigie. Subject_Testament. — Held (reversing the…
Read MoreJohn Hislop V Duke of Buccleuch
John Hislop, Appellant.—Moncreiff—Maconochie—Whigham v. Duke of Buccleuch, Respondent.—Gifford—MackenzieJuly 2. 1821. Lords Craigie and Cringletie. Subject_Entail — Lease — Purgation. —…
Read MoreWilliam Arbuthnot v James Gibson
William Arbuthnot, Appellant.—Gifford—Cranstoun—L’Amy—Walker v. James Gibson, Respondent.—Thomson—Fullerton—MurrayMay 23. 1821. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Title to Pursue. — 1. Whether it is competent…
Read MoreS. Stirling and Others v R. Forrester
S. Stirling and Others, Trustees of the late John M’Kenzie, Appellants.—Romilly—Rutherfurd v. R. Forrester, for the Bank of Scotland, Respondent.—Cockburn—WalkerJune…
Read MoreSir William Forbes v J. Gibson
Sir William Forbes, Appellant.—Gifford—Warren—Walker v. J. Gibson, Respondent.—Wetherell—Thomson—Grant—Fullerton—MurrayMay 23. 1821. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Process — Title to Pursue. — 1. Whether…
Read MorePetition and Case of John Bowes v Counter Petition and Claim for Thomas Bowes
Petition and Case of John Bowes, an infant, claiming the titles, honours, and dignities of Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorn,…
Read MoreMrs. Baillie v General Baillie
Mrs. Baillie, Appellant.—Romilly—Clerk—Robinson v. General Baillie, Respondent.—Cranstoun—Jeffrey—Fullerton—CockburnMay 23. 1821. Bill-Chamber. Lord Reston. Subject_Divorce. — Held (affirming the judgment of the…
Read MoreJoseph Astley v John Taylor
Joseph Astley, Appellant.—Warren—More v. John Taylor, Respondent.—Romilly—ForsythJune 25. 1821. Lord Meadowbank. Subject_Patent. — The Court of Session having fonnd that…
Read MoreJohn Watt v David Blair
John Watt, Appellant.—Warren—Noland v. David Blair, The Trustees for Fisheries, &c., in Scotland, and J. Campbell and T. Williamson, Respondents.—Gifford—MoncreiffJune…
Read MoreSir James Montgomery v Walter Francis
Sir James Montgomery, Bart., and Others, Appellants v. Walter Francis, Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry, and Others, Respondentsand John Hyslop,…
Read MoreJ. Gibson v Sir Wm. Forbes
J. Gibson, Appellant.—Romilly—Clerk—Thomson—W. Murray—J. A. Murray v. Sir Wm. Forbes, Respondent.—Gifford—Warren—WalkerMay 23. 1821. Subject_Freehold Qualification — Jurisdiction. — Held (affirming…
Read MoreEarl of Elgin v Robert Wellwood
Earl of Elgin, Appellant.—Romilly—Erskine—Bell v. Robert Wellwood, Respondent.—Clerk—MoncreiffJune 13. 1821. Lord Armadale. Subject_Entail. — Held (affirming the judgment of the…
Read MoreDr. James R. Barclay v Right Hon. W. Adam
Dr. James R. Barclay, Appellant.—Moncreiff—Keay v. Right Hon. W. Adam, Respondent.—Clerk—Irvine—CranstounMay 18. 1821. Lord Gillies. Subject_Tailzie. — Held (affirming the…
Read MoreA. Wallace, for the Glasgow Glass-Work Company v J. Geddes
. Wallace, for the Glasgow Glass-Work Company, Appellant.—Leach—Cuninghame v. J. Geddes, Respondent.—Warren—ForsythJune 13. 1821. Lord Craig. Subject_Interest — Expenses. —…
Read MoreDennistoun, Buchanan, and Company v D. Lillie and Others
Dennistoun, Buchanan, and Company, Appellants.—Sol.-Gen. Wedderburn—Romilly—Cranstoun v. D. Lillie and Others, Respondents.—Wetherell—DenmanApril 5. 1821. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Insurance. — Held (affirming…
Read More
