John Dick, Esq., Appellant v. John Donald, and (by revivor) Donald Cuthbertson, Trustee on the Sequestrated Estate of James Corbett,…
Read MoreW. Hill and Others v Rev. J. Burns and Others
W. Hill and Others, Appellants.—Warren—Robertson v. Rev. J. Burns and Others, Respondents.—Keay—MenziesApril 14, 1826. Lord Meadowbank Subject_Testament—Trust—Implied Will—Mortification.— Held (affirming…
Read MoreC. Ferrier and J. White, v J. Berry and his Trustee
C. Ferrier and J. White, Appellants.—Adam—Robertson v. J. Berry and his Trustee, Respondents.—Montague—KeayApril 25th, 1826. Subject_Bankrupt — Stat. 54. Geo.…
Read MoreWm. Maule, Esq v Hon. William Ramsay Maule
Wm. Maule, Esq., Appellant.—Shadwell—Adam—Robertson v. Hon. William Ramsay Maule, and Earl of Dalhousie, Respondents.—Brougham —Keay—James CampbellMay 26, 1826. Lord Alloway.…
Read MoreSir Michael Shaw Stewart, Bart v James Corbet Porterfield, Esq.
Sir Michael Shaw Stewart, Bart., Appellant.—Fullerton—Keay v. James Corbet Porterfield, Esq. Respondent.—D. of Fac. Cranstoun,—MurrayMay 24, 1826. Subject_Tailzie.— Faculty.— Prescription.—…
Read MoreSir James Campbell of Ardkinglass v Madame L. Taline Sassen and W. M’Kenzie
Sir James Campbell of Ardkinglass, Bart. Appellant.—Lushington—Keay v. Madame L. Taline Sassen and W. M’Kenzie, W. S. Respondents.— Jas. Campbell—RobertsonMay.…
Read MoreRobert Spier v James Dunlop
Robert Spier, Trustee on John Dunlop’s Sequestrated Estate, Appellant.—Adam.—Jas. Campbell v. James Dunlop, Respondent.—Shadwell—BuchananMay 22, 1826. Lords Mackenzie and Eldin.…
Read MoreThe Officers of State v The Earl of Haddington
The Officers of State, Appellants.—Sol.-Gen. Wetherell—Miller v. The Earl of Haddington, Respondent.—Shadwell—Robertson. et e contraMay 26. 1826. Lord Pitmiliy. Subject_King’s…
Read MoreMagistrates of Glasgow and Tacksman v Dawsons and Mitchell
Magistrates of Glasgow and Tacksman, Appellants.—Adam—Keay v. Dawsons and Mitchell, Respondents.—Robertson—CampbellMay 22, 1826. Lord Alloway. Subject_Burgh Royal — Feu —…
Read MoreLady Mary Lindsay Craufurd v Col. W. C. Campbell
Lady Mary Lindsay Craufurd, Appellant.—Warren—Adam v. Col. W. C. Campbell, Respondent.—Keay—John CampbellMay 26, 1826. Lord Alloway. Subject_Jurisdiction.—Exhibition.—Peerage.— Held (reversing the…
Read MoreLady Mary L. Craufurd v J. and T. Dixon, &c
Lady Mary L. Craufurd, Appellant.—Shadwell—Robertson. v. J. and T. Dixon, &c. Respondents.—Keay—Jas. CampbellMay 23, 1826. Lord Alloway. Subject_Tack — Coal…
Read MoreJames Miller v Lord and Lady Gwydir
James Miller, Appellant.—Keay—Abercrombiev. Lord and Lady Gwydir, Respondents.—Adam. D. DundasMarch 8, 1826. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Landlord and Tenant — Penal Rent.…
Read MoreJames M’Braire v G. and W. Hamiltons
James M’Braire, Appellant—Abercrombie v. G. and W. Hamiltons, Respondents—KeayMar. 22th, 1826. Bill Chamber. Lord Eldin. Subject_Process — Society — Mandate.…
Read MoreJames Campbell v Mrs Steele and J. Lang
James Campbell, Esq. of Bedlay, Appellant.—Adam—Wilson v. Mrs Steele and J. Lang, Respondents.—StephensMay. 23. 1826. Lord Alloway. Subject_Superior and Vassal.…
Read MoreJames Bryce v Walter Graham
James Bryce, Appellant—Keay—Campbell John Dickson and Others, Interdictors of James Bryce; and Andrew Steele, his Agent, Appellants—Shadwell—Abercromby v. Walter Graham,…
Read MoreGovernors of Heriot’s Hospital v T. Cockburn
Governors of Heriot’s Hospital, Appellants.—Keay—Robertson. v. T. Cockburn, J. C. Maxwell, and Others, RespondentsMay 23, 1826. Lord Meadow bank. Subject_Superior…
Read MoreElizabeth W. French v J. Marshall
Elizabeth W. French, or Hay, and Trustees; and A. Neish, Appellants.—Buchanan—Tindal v. J. Marshall, (Hay’s Trustee,) Respondent.—Keay—MenziesMar. 22, 1826 Lord…
Read MoreEarl of Stair v Earl of Stair’s Trustees
Earl of Stair, Appellant.—Abercromby—Robertson Scott v. Earl of Stair’s Trustees, Respondents.—Shadwell—Murray—John MillerMay 24, 1826. Lord Eldin. Subject_Trust. — A party…
Read MoreDuke of Queensberry’s Trustees v Marquis of Queensberry
Duke of Queensberry’s Trustees, Appellants.—Murray—Abercrombie v. Marquis of Queensberry, Respondent.—Brougham—Keay—SandfordMay 22. 1826. Lord Meadow-bank Subject_Tailzie. — Reparation. — The Court…
Read MoreClayton and Others v R. Lowthian
Clayton and Others, ( Lowthian’s Heirs-Portioners,) Appellants.—Shadwell—Abercromby v. R. Lowthian, Ross, and Others, (Executors of Lowthian,) Respondents.—Adam—KeayMar. 3, 1826. Lord…
Read More
