The Principles on which the Judgments of the House of Lords in the late Cases respecting the Law of Entail…
Read MoreBirtwhistle v. Vardill
Verdict and Judgment of the Court of King’s Bench, and Questions proposed by the House of Lords to the Twelve…
Read MoreWilliam Trotter and Others v Young Trotter
William Trotter and Others, Appellants.—Sol.-Gen.—Adam v. Young Trotter, Respondent.—Sugden—CampbellJune 10. 1829. Lord Pitmiliy. Subject_Foreign — Testament — Approbate and Reprobate.…
Read MoreWilliam Colhoun Stirling v William Dun
William Colhoun Stirling, and his Commissioners, Appellants.—Keay—Dunlop v. William Dun, Respondent.—Lushington—A. M’NeillJune 22. 1829. Lord Newton. Subject_Entail — Lease —…
Read MoreWilliam Bennet v Robert M’Lachlan
William Bennet, (Trustee for the Creditors of John Crawford and Company), Appellant.—Adam—Ivory—Keay v. Robert M’Lachlan, (Assignee in trust for the…
Read MoreWalter Ross and Henry Anderson v Sir Coutts Trotter
Walter Ross and Henry Anderson, (Representative of William Anderson), Appellants.—Scarlett—Maitland Mrs Henrietta Lockhart or Wilson and Husband, and the Trustees…
Read MoreJohn Lee Allen v James Berry
John Lee Allen, Appellant.—Sol.—Gen.—Adam v. James Berry, Respondent.—Murray—CampbellJune 10. 1829. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Lease. — A way-going tenant, whose ish was…
Read MoreJames Campbell of Kilberry v Donald Brown
James Campbell of Kilberry, and Others, Appellants.Lushington—Hunter v. Donald Brown, Respondent.—Spankie—NapierJune 12. 1829. Lord Alloway. Subject_Jurisdiction — Statute. — Held,…
Read MoreDowne, Bell, and Mitchell v John Pitcairn, and Others
June 24. 1829. Lord Pitmilly. Subject_Title to Pursue — Partnership — Compensation — Process — Appeal. — 1. Circumstances under…
Read MoreCommercial Banking Company of Scotland v John Pollock’s Trustees
Commercial Banking Company of Scotland, Appellants.Sugden—Lushington v. John Pollock’s Trustees, Respondents.—Adam—StevensJune 12. 1829. Lord Pitmiliy. Subject_Mutual Contract — Master and…
Read MoreColin Campbell v Alexander Anderson
Colin Campbell, Appellant.—Pollock—T. H. Miller v. Alexander Anderson, Respondent.—Adam—WilsonMay 1. 1829. Lord Medwyn. Subject_Mandate — Res noviter. — 1. Held,…
Read MoreCharles Cunningham v Hugh Veitch
Charles Cunningham and Carlyle Bell, Town-Clerks of Edinburgh, Appellants.—Sol.-Gen.—(Tindal)—Adam v. Hugh Veitch, Town-Clerk of Leith, RespondentJune 24. 1829 Lord Eldin.…
Read MoreArch. M’Phail, (a Pauper) v William Glennie, (a Pauper)
Arch. M’Phail, (a Pauper), Appellant.—Murray—Heath v. William Glennie, (a Pauper), Respondent.—WilsonMay 11. 1829. Lords Alloway and Eldin. Subject_Implied Obligation —…
Read MoreArchibald Speirs, and Others v Houston’s Executors, and Oliver Vile, Houston’s Assignee
Archibald Speirs, and Others, Appellants and Respondents v. Houston’s Executors, and Oliver Vile, Houston’s Assignee, Respondents and AppellantsMay 22. 1829.…
Read MoreAlexander Ritchie v John Mackay
Alexander Ritchie, Appellant.—Lushington—Hunter v. John Mackay, Respondent.—Spankie—NapierJune 24. 1829. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Bill of Exchange. — Oath. — The Court of…
Read MoreAlexander and William Malcolms v Thomas Young
Alexander and William Malcolms, Appellants. T. H. Miller—Rodger v. Thomas Young, RespondentJune 5. 1829. Lord Eldin. Subject_Lease — Assignation —…
Read MoreWilliam Spence v Alexander Ross
William Spence, Appellant v. Alexander Ross, Respondent.—Lushington—IvoryMarch 25. 1829. Lord Mackenzie. Subject_Locus Pœnitentiæ — Absolute or Revocable — Fiar. —…
Read MoreLeitch and Others v Leitch’s Trustees
Leitch and Others, Appellants.—Adam—Stuart v. Leitch’s Trustees, Respondents.—Sugden—John CampbellFeb. 17. 1829. Lord Cringletie. Subject_Fee, Conditional or Absolute. — A party…
Read MoreWilliam Eaton and Hugh Cowan v Alexander Murdoch
William Eaton and Hugh Cowan, Appellants. John Campbell—Fullerton—Keay v. Alexander Murdoch, Curator Bonis to John and Robert Watsons, Respondent.—Adam—SandfordJuly 4.…
Read MoreThomas Harvie of Westthorn v George Rodgers
Thomas Harvie of Westthorn, Appellant.—Dean of Faculty Moncreiff—Brougham v. George Rodgers, and Others, Respondents.—Adam—KeayJuly 8. 1828. Jury Court. Subject_Prescription —…
Read More
