II. Caledonian Railway Order. Headnote: This Order was promoted by the Caledonian Railway Company for a variety of purposes. Inter…
Read MoreII. Caledonian Railway Order. Headnote: This Order was promoted by the Caledonian Railway Company for a variety of purposes. Inter…
Read MoreEden and Others v. North-Eastern Railway Company. Subject_Mines — Compensation — Railway Company — Coal Required to be Left Unworked…
Read MoreDe Beers Consolidated Mines, Limited v. Howe. Subject_Revenue — Income-Tax — Company — Residence within the United Kingdom — Test…
Read MoreDunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company, Limited v. Dunlop Motor Company, Limited.( Ante, July 20, 1906, 43 S.L.R. 784, 8 F. 1146.)…
Read MoreAttorney-General v. Mersey Railway Company. Subject_Railway — Omnibus Service — Incidental Powers — Ultra Vires. Facts: A railway company started…
Read MoreClippens Oil Company, Limited v. Edinburgh and District Water Trustees.(In the Court of Session, March 20, 1906, reported 43 S.L.R.…
Read MoreBoard of Trade v. Baxter and Another, “The Scarsdale.” Subject_Ship — Voyage — Wages — Agreement — End of Voyage…
Read MoreYstradyfodwg And Pontypridd Main Sewerage Board v Bensted (Surveyor of Taxes) – UKHL TC_5_230 19 June 1907 Income Tax, Schedule…
Read MoreYstradyfodwg and Pontypridd Main Sewerage Board v. Bensted. Subject_Revenue — Income-Tax — Sewer — “Hereditament” — “Capable of Actual Occupation”…
Read MoreNicolson v. Piper. Subject_Master and Servant — Workmen’s Compensation Act 1897 (60 and 61 Vict. cap. 37) — Payment during…
Read MorePoole and Others v. National Bank of China. Subject_Company — Reduction of Capital and Shares — Petition for Order Confirming…
Read MoreS. Pearson & Son, Limited v. Dublin Corporation. Subject_Contract — Principal and Agent — Fraudulent Misrepresentation — Clause Disclaiming Responsibility…
Read MoreM’Dougall v. Nisbet. 44SLR0633_1 Neilson v. R. B. Wilson & Company.(In the Court of Session, November 17, 1904, 42 S.L.R.…
Read MoreVII. Paisley and District Tramways Order. Headnote: The main object of this Order was to obtain authority to construct a…
Read MoreMersey Docks and Harbour Board v. Owners of Steamship “Marpessa.” Subject_Ship — Collision — Damage — Measure — Demurrage —…
Read MoreMurray’s Trustees. v. Trustees of St Margaret’s Convent.(In the Court of Session, July 19, 1906, 43 S.L.R. 774, 8 F.…
Read MoreVI. Galashiels Drainage and Burgh Extension. Headnote: This Order was promoted by the Provost, Councillors, and Magistrates of Galashiels to…
Read MoreV. Edinburgh and District Water. Headnote: This Order was promoted by the Edinburgh and District Water Trustees. Its objects were,…
Read MoreSweeney v. Coote. Subject_Reparation — Conspiracy — Action of Damages — Combination of Parents to Secure Dismissal of Teacher because…
Read MoreIV. Portobello and Musselburgh Tramways (Levenhall Extension) Order. Headnote: The object of this Order was to enable the Musselburgh and…
Read More