No. 28 Argued: October 30, 1907Decided: December 2, 1907 This is a writ of error to the circuit court of…
Read MoreWALKER v. MCLOUD(1907)
No. 140 Argued: Decided: February 4, 1907 The appellant, who was plaintiff below, appeals from the judgment of the circuit…
Read MoreAMERICAN SMELTING & REFINING CO. v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF COLORADO(1907)
No. 143 Argued: Decided: January 7, 1907 The writ of error in this case brings up for review the judgment…
Read MoreAMERICAN R. CO. OF PORTO RICO v. CASTRO(1907)
No. 151 Argued: Decided: February 25, 1907 Julio P. Castro, defendant in error, was plaintiff in the court below, and…
Read MoreAMERICAN EXP CO. v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1907)
No. 583 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1907 Messrs. Edmund F. Trabue, Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., John C. Doolan, Attilla Cox, Jr.,…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1907)
No. 192 Argued: Decided: February 25, 1907 Messrs. Charles Calvert Lancaster and Herbert E. Smith for appellant. Assistant Attorney General…
Read MoreADAMS EXP CO. v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1907)
No. 331 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1907 On February 17, 1904, a grand jury returned into the circuit court of…
Read MoreADAMS EXP CO. v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1907)
No. 332 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1907 Messrs. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., E. F. Trabue, and Joseph S. Graydon for plaintiff…
Read MoreYORK MFG CO. v. CASSELL(1906)
No. 208 Argued: March 14, 1906Decided: April 2, 1906 The York Manufacturing Company has appealed from a judgment of the…
Read MoreWICOMICO COUNTY COM’RS v. BANCROFT(1906)
No. 129 Argued: October 9, 1906Decided: November 5, 1906 Mr. James E. Ellegood for petitioners. Messrs. Nicholas P. Bond, Ralph…
Read MoreU S v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO(1906)
No. 269 Argued: April 27, 1906Decided: May 28, 1906 The question in the case is whether certain sugars which were…
Read MoreU S EX REL TAYLOR v. TAFT(1906)
No. 300 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1906 Relator was, on May 12, 1902, a clerk in the classified civil service…
Read MoreU S EX REL LOWRY v. ALLEN(1906)
No. 56 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1906 Messrs. Oliver Mitchell, Edmund Wetmore, and Meyers, Cushman, & Rea for plaintiffs in…
Read MoreTEXAS & P R. CO. v. MUGG & DRYDEN(1906)
No. 233 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1906 The railroad company, plaintiff in error in this record, appealed to the court…
Read MoreTERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO v. ATCHISON, T & S F RY. CO(1906)
No. 182 Argued: January 26, 1906Decided: March 12, 1906 Messrs. Frank W. Clancy and A. H. Harllee for appellant. Messrs.…
Read MoreTERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. E. J. MCLEAN & CO. v. DENVER & R.(1906)
No. 18 Argued: Decided: October 15, 1906 Messrs. William B. Childers and T. B. Catron for appellant. Messrs. Charles A.…
Read MoreTAYLOR v. BURNS(1906)
No. 28 Argued: Decided: November 12, 1906 On March 26, 1901, Thomas Burns, the owner of three mining claims, as…
Read MoreSUCCESSION OF SERRALLES v. ESBRI(1906)
No. 65 Argued: November 27, 1905Decided: January 2, 1906 Statement by Mr. Justice Peckham: The appellee, plaintiff below, commenced this…
Read MoreALBRIGHT v. TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL SANDOVAL(1906)
No. 229 Argued: Decided: January 2, 1906 Mr. William B. Childers for appellant. Mr. Neill B. Field for appellee. Mr.…
Read MoreSTRICKLEY v. HIGHLAND BOY GOLD MINING CO(1906)
No. 172 Argued: Decided: February 19, 1906 Messrs. Arthur Brown and Frank Hoffman for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. George Sutherland,…
Read More
