No. 59 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1894 Andrew J. Riker, in pro. per. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of…
Read MoreALLIS v. U S(1894)
No. 661 Argued: Decided: November 12, 1894 The indictment consisted of 25 counts. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and the…
Read MoreAMERICAN CONST. CO. v. JACKSONVILLE T. & K. W. R. CO.(1893)
No. 14 Argued: Decided: March 27, 1893 Statement by Mr. Justice GRAY: These was two petitions to this court, each…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1893)
No. 969 Argued: Decided: December 4, 1893 Statement by Mr. Chief Justice FULLER. Alexander Allen was indicted at the November…
Read MoreALEXANDRE v. MACHAN(1893)
No. 61 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1893 Statement by Mr. Justice BROWN. This was a libel by the owners of…
Read MoreALBUQUERQUE NAT BANK v. PEREA(1893)
No. 710 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1893 In equity. Suit by the Albuquerque National Bank against Jose L. Perea, sheriff…
Read MoreABADIE v. U S(1893)
No. 260 Argued: Decided: May 1, 1893 James Herrman, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for the United States. Mr.…
Read MoreBROWN v. MARION NAT BANK OF LEBANON(1892)
Argued: Decided: December 19, 1892 W. J. Lisle, for defendant in error. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. The writ of error is…
Read MoreBRINKERHOFF v. ALOE(1892)
No. 85 Argued: Decided: December 12, 1892 Suit by Milford H. Brinkerhoff and Willie C. Brinkerhoff, executors of Alexander W.…
Read MoreBOYD v. U S(1892)
Argued: Decided: January 4, 1892 A. H. Garland, for plaintiffs in error. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for the United States.…
Read MoreBOYD v. STATE OF NEBRASKA(1892)
No. 42 Argued: Decided: February 1, 1892 On the 13th of January, A. D. 1891. leave was granted to John…
Read MoreBENSON v. U.S.(1892)
No. 1007 Argued: Decided: December 5, 1892 Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for the United States. Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the…
Read MoreBALLOCH v. HOOPER(1892)
No. 21 Argued: Decided: December 5, 1892 S. S. Henkle, for appellant. Job Barnard and Jas. S. Edwards, for appellees.…
Read MoreKNIGHT v. UNITED LAND ASS’N(1891)
No. 40 Argued: Decided: December 21, 1891 The complaint, filed on the 23d of November, 1880, alleged that the plaintiffs…
Read MoreCRUTCHER v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1891)
Argued: Decided: May 25, 1891 This case arose at Frankfort, Franklin county, Ky., upon an indictment found against Crutcher, the…
Read MoreCOOK v. U S(1891)
No. 2030 Argued: Decided: January 26, 1891 Jos. Frease, Wm. R. Day, John F. Dillon, Geo. R. Peck, and W.…
Read MoreCLARK THREAD CO. v. WILLIMANTIC LINEN CO.(1891)
Argued: Decided: May 25, 1891 Livingston Gifford and Edmund Wetmore, for appellant. W. C. Miller, Clarence A. Seward, W. H.…
Read MoreCITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. NEW ORLEANS WATER-WORKS CO.(1891)
No. 909 Argued: Decided: December 14, 1891 The facts of the case fully appear in the following statement by Mr.…
Read MoreBRIMMER v. REBMAN(1891)
Argued: Decided: January 19, 1891 R. Taylor Scott, Atty. Gen. Va., and R. M. Hughes, for appellant. Wm. J. Campbell,…
Read MoreALEXANDER v. U S(1891)
Argued: Decided: February 2, 1891 A. H. Garland and Heber J. May, for plaintiff in error. Sol. Gen. Taft, for…
Read More
