No. 144 Argued: Decided: April 3, 1899 There was a stipulation that the purchaser should have a right to enter…
Read MoreALLEN v. SMITH(1899)
No. 168 Argued: Decided: March 6, 1899 Letters testamentary were issued to William F. Collins, Ogden Smith, and M. Elizabeth…
Read MoreAINSA v. NEW MEXICO & A. R. CO.(1899)
Argued: Decided: October 30, 1899 See same case below, 36 Pac. 213. The facts are stated in the opinion. On…
Read MoreADDYSTON PIPE & STEEL CO. v. U. S.(1899)
No. 51 Argued: Decided: December 4, 1899 This proceeding was commenced in behalf of the United States, under the so-called…
Read MoreABBOT v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE(1899)
No. 376 Argued: Decided: December 11, 1899 Messrs. John H. Mitchell and W. C. Sharpstein for plaintiff in error. Messrs.…
Read MoreBENJAMIN v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS(1898)
No. 188 Argued: Decided: January 31, 1898 J. D. Rouse and Wm. Grant, for appellant. Branch K. Miller, for appellee.…
Read MoreBELEY v. NAPHTALY(1898)
No. 180 Argued: Decided: February 28, 1898 The defendant in error, who was the plaintiff below, brought this action in…
Read MoreBARROW S.S. CO. v. KANE(1898)
No. 353 Argued: Decided: April 11, 1898 This was an action brought November 1, 1894, in the circuit court of…
Read MoreBAKER v. WALTER BAKER & CO.(1898)
No. 534 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1898 Holmes Conrad and R. T. Barton, for petitioner. George Putnam, for respondent. No…
Read MoreBAKER v. GRICE(1898)
No. 336 Argued: Decided: February 21, 1898 The petition for the writ was filed on the 9th of December, 1896,…
Read MoreBAKER v. CUMMINGS(1898)
No. 189 Argued: Decided: February 21, 1898 This suit was commenced by appellee, Cummings, on February 1, 1890, by a…
Read MoreBACKUS v. FORT ST. UNION DEPOT CO.(1898)
No. 55 Argued: Decided: March 7, 1898 The constitution of Michigan provides: Article 15, 9: ‘The property of no person…
Read MoreANDERSEN v. U S(1898)
No. 583 Argued: Decided: May 9, 1898 The indictment charged that Andersen, ‘on the 6th day of August, in the…
Read MoreANDERSEN v. TREAT(1898)
No. 415 Argued: Decided: November 14, 1898 John Andersen was indicted in the circuit court of the United States for…
Read MoreAMERICAN SURETY CO v. PAULY(1898)
No. 169 Argued: Decided: April 18, 1898 Edward Winslow Paige, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion…
Read MoreAMERICAN SUR CO OF NEW YORK v. PAULY(1898)
No. 168 Argued: Decided: April 18, 1898 Edward Winslow Paige, for defendant in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion…
Read MoreWESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. v. TAGGART(1896)
No. 662 Argued: Decided: May 18, 1896 That the ‘portion of said telegraphic plant situated within said state of Indiana…
Read MoreWILSON v. KIESEL(1896)
No. 139 Argued: Decided: November 30, 1896 Ogden Hiles, for appellant. Abbot R. Heywood, for appellees. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER…
Read MoreFALLBROOK IRRIGATION DIST v. BRADLEY(1896)
No. 355 Argued: Decided: November 16, 1896 This is an appeal from the United States circuit court for the Southern…
Read MoreBALL v. HALSELL(1896)
No. 471 Argued: Decided: March 2, 1896 J. G. Halsell.’ The signature of the contract was admitted. The other material…
Read More
