No. 176 Argued: January 24, 1907Decided: February 25, 1907 The plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, filed their complaint…
Read MoreWEBSTER COAL & COKE CO. v. CASSATT(1907)
No. 283 Argued: Decided: December 2, 1907 The Webster coal & Coke Company commenced an action at law in the…
Read MoreARMSTRONG v. ASHLEY(1907)
No. 122 Argued: Decided: January 21, 1907 This suit was brought in the supreme court of the District of Columbia…
Read MoreWATER, LIGHT & GAS CO. OF HUTCHINSON, KAN. v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON(1907)
No. 53 Argued: November 13, 1907Decided: December 23, 1907 The ultimate question in these cases is the validity of ordinance…
Read MoreARKANSAS SOUTHERN R. CO. v. GERMAN NAT BANK(1907)
No. 56 Argued: Decided: December 2, 1907 Mr. Edward B. Peirce for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. John Fletcher, W. C.…
Read MoreWALLACE v. ADAMS(1907)
No. 260 Argued: December 21, 1906Decided: February 25, 1907 Messrs. A. C. Cruce, Jackson H. Ralston, Frederick L. Siddons, William…
Read MoreAMERICAN TOBACCO CO. v. WERCKMEISTER(1907)
No. 28 Argued: October 30, 1907Decided: December 2, 1907 This is a writ of error to the circuit court of…
Read MoreWALKER v. MCLOUD(1907)
No. 140 Argued: Decided: February 4, 1907 The appellant, who was plaintiff below, appeals from the judgment of the circuit…
Read MoreAMERICAN SMELTING & REFINING CO. v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF COLORADO(1907)
No. 143 Argued: Decided: January 7, 1907 The writ of error in this case brings up for review the judgment…
Read MoreAMERICAN R. CO. OF PORTO RICO v. CASTRO(1907)
No. 151 Argued: Decided: February 25, 1907 Julio P. Castro, defendant in error, was plaintiff in the court below, and…
Read MoreAMERICAN EXP CO. v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1907)
No. 583 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1907 Messrs. Edmund F. Trabue, Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., John C. Doolan, Attilla Cox, Jr.,…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1907)
No. 192 Argued: Decided: February 25, 1907 Messrs. Charles Calvert Lancaster and Herbert E. Smith for appellant. Assistant Attorney General…
Read MoreADAMS EXP CO. v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1907)
No. 331 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1907 On February 17, 1904, a grand jury returned into the circuit court of…
Read MoreADAMS EXP CO. v. COM. OF KENTUCKY(1907)
No. 332 Argued: Decided: May 13, 1907 Messrs. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., E. F. Trabue, and Joseph S. Graydon for plaintiff…
Read MoreYORK MFG CO. v. CASSELL(1906)
No. 208 Argued: March 14, 1906Decided: April 2, 1906 The York Manufacturing Company has appealed from a judgment of the…
Read MoreWICOMICO COUNTY COM’RS v. BANCROFT(1906)
No. 129 Argued: October 9, 1906Decided: November 5, 1906 Mr. James E. Ellegood for petitioners. Messrs. Nicholas P. Bond, Ralph…
Read MoreU S v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO(1906)
No. 269 Argued: April 27, 1906Decided: May 28, 1906 The question in the case is whether certain sugars which were…
Read MoreU S EX REL TAYLOR v. TAFT(1906)
No. 300 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1906 Relator was, on May 12, 1902, a clerk in the classified civil service…
Read MoreU S EX REL LOWRY v. ALLEN(1906)
No. 56 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1906 Messrs. Oliver Mitchell, Edmund Wetmore, and Meyers, Cushman, & Rea for plaintiffs in…
Read MoreTEXAS & P R. CO. v. MUGG & DRYDEN(1906)
No. 233 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1906 The railroad company, plaintiff in error in this record, appealed to the court…
Read More
