No. 38 Argued: November 4, 1910Decided: November 28, 1910 Messrs. A. A. Gunby and Allan Sholars for plaintiffs in error.…
Read MoreWRIGHT v. GEORGIA RAILROAD & BANKING CO(1910)
No. 70 Argued: January 11, 1910Decided: February 21, 1910 Messrs. John C. Hart, Samuel H. Sibley, Hooper Alexander, and Ligon…
Read MoreWOODSIDE v. BECKHAM(1910)
No. 56 Argued: December 9, 1909Decided: February 21, 1910 Messrs. John R. Smith and Hartley B. Woods for plaintiff in…
Read MoreAMERICAN NAT BANK OF WASHINGTON v. TAPPAN(1910)
No. 837 Argued: Decided: May 31, 1910 Mr. Alexander Wolf for defendant in error. Judgment affirmed with costs, without opinion.
Read MoreALBRIGHT v. SANDOVAL(1910)
No. 116 Argued: Decided: February 21, 1910 Mr. Edward L. Medler for plaintiff in error in No. 116, and defendant…
Read MoreWITHNELL v. WILLIAM R BUSH CONST CO.(1910)
No. 108 Argued: Decided: February 28, 1910 Mr. E. C. Kehr for respondents. Decree affirmed with costs by a divided…
Read MoreALBRIGHT v. SANDOVAL(1910)
No. 118 Argued: Decided: February 21, 1910 Mr. Edward L. Medler for appellant. Mr. Neill B. Field for appellee. Mr.…
Read MoreWILLIAMS v. STATE OF ARKANSAS(1910)
No. 138 Argued: Decided: April 4, 1910 Messrs. George B. Rose, U. M. Rose, W. E. Hemingway, D. H. Cantrell,…
Read More7 LING SU FAN v. U S(1910)
No. 20 Argued: October 27, 1910Decided: November 14, 1910 Messrs. J. M. Vale, Marion Butler, and Lionel D. Hargis for…
Read MoreBOARD OF COM’RS OF SANTA FE COUNTY v. NEW MEXICO EX REL(1909)
No. 42 Argued: Decided: December 20, 1909 Mr. A. B. Renehan for appellants. Mr. Charles A. Spiess for appellees. Mr.…
Read MoreBALTIMORE & O.R. CO. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION(1909)
No. 339 Argued: Decided: December 6, 1909 This was a bill in equity filed by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad…
Read MoreWATERS-PIERCE OIL CO. v. DESELMS(1909)
No. 62 Argued: January 8, 1909Decided: February 1, 1909 Messrs. John W. Shartel, J. D. Johnson, James R. Keaton, and…
Read MoreYORDI v. NOLTE(1909)
No. 382 Argued: Decided: December 6, 1909 Pablo Yordi, being detained in custody by the United States marshal of the…
Read MoreU. S. v. MASON(1909)
No. 642 Argued: March 5, 1909Decided: April 5, 1909 Assistant Attorney General Fowler for plaintiff in error. Messrs. John M.…
Read MoreBAGLEY v. GENERAL FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO(1909)
No. 96 Argued: January 27, 1909Decided: February 23, 1909 Mr. Henry B. Closson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Peter B.…
Read MoreU. S. v. BIGGS(1909)
No. 289 Argued: Decided: January 4, 1909 Solicitor General Hoyt, Attorney General Bonaparte, and Mr. Edwin W. Lawrence for plaintiff…
Read MoreU S v. UNION SUPPLY CO(1909)
No. 120 Argued: Decided: November 8, 1909 Solicitor General Bowers for plaintiff in error. Mr. Isaac R. Hitt, Jr., for…
Read MoreATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. CALHOUN(1909)
No. 71 Argued: Decided: February 23, 1909 Messrs. Robert Dunlap, Henry E. Asp, Charles H. Woods, and George M. Green…
Read MoreU S v. NEW YORK CENT & H R R CO(1909)
No. 285 Argued: December 16, 1908Decided: February 23, 1909 Mr. Henry L. Stimson and Assistant Attorney General Ellis for plaintiff…
Read MoreU S v. NATIONAL EXCH BANK OF PROVIDENCE(1909)
No. 90 Argued: Decided: June 1, 1909 This action was brought by the United States to recover the sum of…
Read More
