No. 399 Argued: Decided: June 4, 1951 A so-called “Green River ordinance” of a municipality forbids the practice of going…
Read MoreBOYCE MOTOR LINES v. U S(1951)
No. 199 Argued: Decided: October 15, 1951 Messrs. Elbert R. Jandt and Ben F. Foster, for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman,…
Read MoreBOWMAN DAIRY CO. v. UNITED STATES(1951)
No. 435 Argued: March 9, 1951Decided: April 30, 1951 Before trial on an indictment for violation of 1 of the…
Read MoreBLAU v. UNITED STATES(1951)
No. 21 Argued: November 7, 1950Decided: January 15, 1951 Petitioner, a witness before a federal grand jury in response to…
Read MoreBINDCZYCK v. FINUCANE(1951)
No. 18 Argued: October 10, 1951Decided: November 26, 1951 1. The procedure prescribed by 338 of the Nationality Act of…
Read MoreANTI-FASCIST COMMITTEE v. McGRATH(1951)
No. 9835 Argued: October 11, 1950Decided: April 30, 1951 Purporting to act under Part III, 3 of Executive Order No.…
Read MoreAMERICAN FIRE & CAS. CO. v. FINN(1951)
No. 252 Argued: December 7, 1950Decided: April 9, 1951 In a suit brought in a Texas court by a resident…
Read MoreALABAMA G. S. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES(1951)
No. 45 Argued: Decided: January 2, 1951 An order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, issued pursuant to 307 (d) of…
Read MoreALABAMA COMM’N v. SOUTHERN R. CO.(1951)
No. 146 Argued: Decided: May 21, 1951 Decided upon the authority of Alabama Public Service Comm’n v. Southern R. Co.,…
Read MoreALABAMA COMM’N v. SOUTHERN R. CO.(1951)
No. 395 Argued: Decided: May 21, 1951 Appellee applied to the Alabama Public Service Commission for a permit to discontinue…
Read More62 CASES OF JAM v. UNITED STATES(1951)
No. 363 Argued: Decided: March 26, 1951 Under 304 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, the…
Read MoreDENNIS v. UNITED STATES(1950)
No. 14 Argued: November 7, 1949Decided: March 27, 1950 Petitioner, who is General Secretary of the Communist Party of the…
Read MoreDENNIS v. U S(1950)
No. 336 Argued: Decided: November 27, 1950 Messrs.Harry Sacher and Abraham J. Isserman, for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, for the…
Read MoreDARR v. BURFORD(1950)
No. 51 Argued: Decided: April 3, 1950 Petitioner, a state prisoner, applied to a Federal District Court for habeas corpus…
Read MoreCOMMUNICATIONS ASSN. v. DOUDS(1950)
No. 10 Argued: Decided: May 8, 1950 Section 9 (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the…
Read MoreCOMMISSIONER v. KORELL(1950)
No. 384 Argued: February 7, 1950Decided: June 5, 1950 In 1944, an individual taxpayer purchased at a premium price of…
Read MoreCIVIL AERO. BD. v. STATE AIRLINES(1950)
No. 157 Argued: December 12, 1949Decided: February 6, 1950 Under the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, the Civil Aeronautics Board…
Read MoreCITIES SERVICE CO. v. PEERLESS CO.(1950)
No. 153 Argued: Decided: December 11, 1950 The Oklahoma Corporation Commission, after hearings and on findings made in proceedings before…
Read MoreCHAPMAN v. SHERIDAN-WYOMING CO.(1950)
No. 60 Argued: January 9, 1950Decided: February 6, 1950 1. Under the Mineral Lands Leasing Act, the Secretary of the…
Read MoreCASSELL v. TEXAS(1950)
No. 46 Argued: November 10, 1949Decided: April 24, 1950 Petitioner, a Negro, was convicted in a Texas state court for…
Read More
