No. 05-204 Argued: March 1, 2006Decided: June 28, 2006 The 1990 census resulted in a 3-seat increase over the 27…
Read MoreLABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLD- INGS, dba LABCORP, PETITIONER v. METABO- LITE LABORATORIES, INC., et al.(2006)
No. 03-1120 Argued: Decided: June 22, 2006 Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. The Chief…
Read MoreKIRCHER et al. v. PUTNAM FUNDS TRUST et al.(2006)
No. 05-409 Argued: April 24, 2006Decided: June 15, 2006 The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (Act) specifies that…
Read MoreBUCKEYE CHECK CASHING, INC. v. CARDEGNA et al.(2006)
No. 04-1264 Argued: November 29, 2005Decided: February 21, 2006 For each deferred-payment transaction respondents entered into with Buckeye Check Cashing,…
Read MoreBROWN, WARDEN v. SANDERS(2006)
No. 04-980 Argued: October 11, 2005Decided: January 11, 2006 In convicting respondent Sanders of, inter alia, first-degree murder, the jury…
Read MoreBRIGHAM CITY, UTAH v. STUART et al.(2006)
No. 05-502 Argued: April 24, 2006Decided: May 22, 2006 Responding to a 3 a.m. call about a loud party, police…
Read MoreBP AMERICA PRODUCTION CO., successor in interest to AMOCO PRODUCTION CO., et al. v. BURTON, ACTING ASSISTANT SECRETARY, LAND AND MINERALS MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al.(2006)
No. 05-669 Argued: October 4, 2006Decided: December 11, 2006 After the Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service (MMS) issued administrative orders…
Read MoreBEARD, SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. BANKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated(2006)
No. 04-1739 Argued: March 27, 2006Decided: June 28, 2006 Pennsylvania houses its 40 most dangerous and recalcitrant inmates in a…
Read MoreAYOTTE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND et al.(2006)
No. 04-1144 Argued: November 30, 2005Decided: January 18, 2006 New Hampshire’s Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act, in relevant part,…
Read MoreAYERS, ACTING WARDEN v. BELMONTES(2006)
No. 05-493 Argued: October 3, 2006Decided: November 13, 2006 In the penalty phase of respondent’s capital murder trial, he introduced…
Read MoreARLINGTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION v. MURPHY et vir.(2006)
No. 05-18 Argued: April 19, 2006Decided: June 26, 2006 After respondents prevailed in their Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)…
Read MoreARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al. v. AHLBORN(2006)
No. 04-1506 Argued: February 27, 2006Decided: May 1, 2006 Federal Medicaid law requires participating States to “ascertain the legal liability…
Read MoreARBAUGH v. Y & H CORP. dba THE MOONLIGHT CAFE(2006)
No. 04-944 Argued: January 11, 2006Decided: February 22, 2006 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it…
Read MoreANZA et al. v. IDEAL STEEL SUPPLY CORP.(2006)
No. 04-433 Argued: March 27, 2006Decided: June 5, 2006 The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) prohibits certain conduct…
Read MoreANTHONY ASH et al. v. TYSON FOODS, INC.(2006)
No. 05-379 Argued: Decided: February 21, 2006 Per Curiam. Petitioners Anthony Ash and John Hithon were superintendents at a poultry…
Read MoreALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MICHELLE THOMAS et al.(2006)
No. 05-552 Argued: Decided: April 17, 2006 Per Curiam. The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the Attorney General to grant…
Read MoreGONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. RAICH et al.(2005)
No. 03-1454 Argued: November 29, 2004Decided: June 6, 2005 California’s Compassionate Use Act authorizes limited marijuana use for medicinal purposes.…
Read MoreEXXON MOBIL CORP. v. ALLAPATTAH SERVICES, INC., et al.(2005)
No. 04-70 Argued: March 1, 2005Decided: June 23, 2005 In No. 04-70, Exxon dealers filed a class action against Exxon…
Read MoreEXXON MOBIL CORP. et al. v. SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORP.(2005)
No. 03-1696 Argued: February 23, 2005Decided: March 30, 2005 The Rooker-Feldman doctrine, at issue in this case, has been applied…
Read MoreDURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. v. BROUDO et al.(2005)
No. 03-932 Argued: January 12, 2005Decided: April 19, 2005 Respondents filed a securities fraud class action, alleging that petitioners, Dura…
Read More
