No. 788 Argued: Decided: April 8, 1895 The evidence certified to us by the bill of exceptions shows that Philip…
Read MoreABRAHAM v. ORDWAY(1895)
No. 274 Argued: Decided: May 20, 1895 H. O. Claughton and F. N. Mackey, for appellants. J. J. Darlington, for…
Read MoreBOGLE v. MAGONE(1894)
No. 291 Argued: Decided: April 9, 1894 Action at law brought by William B. Bogle, Ruluf Lyles, Alexander Scott, and…
Read MoreBARDEN v. NORTHERN PAC R CO(1894)
No. 612 Argued: Decided: May 26, 1894 This action was brought by the Northern Pacific Railroad Company against Richard P.…
Read MoreBAER v. MORAN BROS. CO.(1894)
No. 683 Argued: Decided: April 30, 1894 T. H. N. McPherson, John H. Mitchell, and M. L. Baer, for plaintiff…
Read MoreASHLEY v. RYAN(1894)
No. 888 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1894 This was an action by Ossian D. Ashley, Thomas H. Hubbard, James F.…
Read MoreANVIL MINING CO v. HUMBLE(1894)
No. 323 Argued: Decided: May 14, 1894 This was an action by John Humble, Joseph H. Johns, and James Johns,…
Read MoreANGLE v. CHICAGO, ST. P., M. & O. RY. CO.(1894)
No. 73 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1894 Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER: This is an appeal from a decree of…
Read MoreALSOP v. RIKER(1894)
No. 59 Argued: Decided: December 10, 1894 Andrew J. Riker, in pro. per. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of…
Read MoreALLIS v. U S(1894)
No. 661 Argued: Decided: November 12, 1894 The indictment consisted of 25 counts. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and the…
Read MoreAMERICAN CONST. CO. v. JACKSONVILLE T. & K. W. R. CO.(1893)
No. 14 Argued: Decided: March 27, 1893 Statement by Mr. Justice GRAY: These was two petitions to this court, each…
Read MoreALLEN v. U S(1893)
No. 969 Argued: Decided: December 4, 1893 Statement by Mr. Chief Justice FULLER. Alexander Allen was indicted at the November…
Read MoreALEXANDRE v. MACHAN(1893)
No. 61 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1893 Statement by Mr. Justice BROWN. This was a libel by the owners of…
Read MoreALBUQUERQUE NAT BANK v. PEREA(1893)
No. 710 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1893 In equity. Suit by the Albuquerque National Bank against Jose L. Perea, sheriff…
Read MoreABADIE v. U S(1893)
No. 260 Argued: Decided: May 1, 1893 James Herrman, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for the United States. Mr.…
Read MoreBROWN v. MARION NAT BANK OF LEBANON(1892)
Argued: Decided: December 19, 1892 W. J. Lisle, for defendant in error. THE CHIEF JUSTICE. The writ of error is…
Read MoreBRINKERHOFF v. ALOE(1892)
No. 85 Argued: Decided: December 12, 1892 Suit by Milford H. Brinkerhoff and Willie C. Brinkerhoff, executors of Alexander W.…
Read MoreBOYD v. U S(1892)
Argued: Decided: January 4, 1892 A. H. Garland, for plaintiffs in error. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for the United States.…
Read MoreBOYD v. STATE OF NEBRASKA(1892)
No. 42 Argued: Decided: February 1, 1892 On the 13th of January, A. D. 1891. leave was granted to John…
Read MoreBENSON v. U.S.(1892)
No. 1007 Argued: Decided: December 5, 1892 Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for the United States. Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the…
Read More
