No. 941 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1911 Messrs. Frank Dale, C. G. Horner, John H. Burford, A. G. C. Bierer,…
Read MoreBRYAN v. KER(1911)
Argued: Decided: November 20, 1911 Assistant Attorney General Denison and Mr. Loring C. Christie for petitioner. Messrs. J. P. Kennedy…
Read MoreBRISCOE v. RUDOLPH(1911)
No. 141 Argued: April 25, 1911Decided: May 29, 1911 Messrs. Samuel Maddox and H. Prescott Gatley for appellant. Mr. Edward…
Read MoreBEAN v. MORRIS(1911)
No. 122 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1911 Messrs. Thomas J. Walsh, Cornelius B. Nolan, and George W. Pierson for petitioners.…
Read MoreBALTIMORE & O S W R. CO. v. U S(1911)
No. 98 Argued: March 4, 1910Decided: March 20, 1911 ‘The act to prevent cruelty to animals while in transit,’ approved…
Read MoreBAILEY v. STATE OF ALABAMA(1911)
No. 300 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1911 Messrs. Edward S. Watts, Fred S. Ball, and Daniel W. Troy for plaintiff…
Read MoreBAGLIN v. CUSENIER CO.(1911)
No. 99 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1911 Messrs. Philip Mauro, C. A. L. Massie, and Ralph L. Scott for appellant.…
Read MoreAPPLEBY v. CITY OF BUFFALO(1911)
No. 162 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1911 Messrs. O. O. Cottle and Edmund P. Cottle for plaintiff in error. Messrs.…
Read MoreANDERSON v. UNITED REALTY CO(1911)
No. 27 Argued: November 1, 1911Decided: December 4, 1911 Mr. Rhea P. Cary for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry E.…
Read MoreGLICKSTEIN v. U S(1911)
No. 486 Argued: Decided: December 4, 1911 Messrs. N. P. Bryan and John E. Hartridge for Glickstein. Solicitor General Lehmann…
Read MoreGLUCKSMAN v. HENKEL(1911)
No. 944 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1911 Mr. Charles Dushkind for appellant. Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert and Charles A. Conlon…
Read MoreAMERICAN LITHOGRAPHIC CO. v. WERCKMEISTER(1911)
No. 115 Argued: April 10, 1911Decided: May 29, 1911 Mr. William A. Jenner for plaintiff in error. Mr. Antonio Knauth…
Read MoreGLICKSTEIN v. U S(1911)
No. 486 Argued: Decided: December 4, 1911 Messrs. N. P. Bryan and John E. Hartridge for Glickstein. Solicitor General Lehmann…
Read MoreFABER v. U S(1911)
No. 134 Argued: Decided: May 29, 1911 This case raises the question as to whether Cuban imports are entitled to…
Read MoreAMERICAN LAND CO. v. ZEISS(1911)
No. 230 Argued: Decided: January 3, 1911 As a result of the conditions caused in San Francisco by the great…
Read MoreEX PARTE HARDING(1911)
Argued: Decided: February 20, 1911 Messrs. George F. Harding and William J. Ammen for petitioner. Mr. Chief Justice White delivered…
Read MoreALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. RAMSEY(1911)
No. 56 Argued: Decided: December 11, 1911 Messrs. Uriah M. Rose, George B. Rose, wilson E. Hemingway, and J. F.…
Read MoreENRIQUEZ v. GO-TIONGCO(1911)
No. 95 Argued: March 13, 1911Decided: April 3, 1911 Messrs. Jackson H. Ralston, Frederick L. Siddons, and William E. Richardson…
Read MoreACME HARVESTER CO. v. BEEKMAN LUMBER CO(1911)
Argued: Decided: December 18, 1911 Messrs. Alexander New, Edwin A. Krauthoff, and Arthur Miller for plaintiff in error. Mr. Hannis…
Read MoreBALLINGER v. U S EX REL FROST(1910)
No. 54 Argued: December 8, 1909Decided: February 21, 1910 Assistant Attorneys General Harr and Lawler for plaintiff in error. Messrs.…
Read More
