Argued: Decided: December 1, 1854 THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the southern…
Read MoreCURRAN v. STATE OF ARKANSAS(1853)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1853 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Arkansas, by a writ of…
Read MoreU S v. HARRISON(1852)
No. 126 Argued: Decided: April 23, 1852 Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court. The appellees in…
Read MoreMOORE v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF ILLINOIS(1852)
No. 45 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1852 THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of…
Read MoreKENNETT v. CHAMBERS(1852)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1852 IN this cause Mr. Justice Catron was absent, because of indisposition, during the hearing before…
Read MoreBLOOMER v. MCQUEWAN(1852)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1852 Mr. Justice Curtis, having been of counsel, did not sit on the trial of this…
Read MoreU S v. FERREIRA(1851)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1851 (Mr. Justice WAYNE did not sit in this cause.) THIS was an appeal from the…
Read MoreTHE PROPELLER GENESEE CHIEF v. FITZHUGH(1851)
No. 82 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1851 THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for…
Read MoreSTATE OF PA. v. WHEELING & BELMONT BRIDGE CO.(1851)
No. 672 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1851 THIS was a case upon the equity side of this court, in the…
Read MoreMITCHELL v. HARMONY(1851)
No. 24 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1851 THIS case was brought up, by a writ of error, from the Circuit…
Read MoreDARRINGTON v. BANK OF ALABAMA(1851)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1851 THESE cases were brought up from the Supreme Court of Alabama, by a writ of…
Read MoreCOOLEY v. BOARD OF WARDENS OF PORT OF PHILADELPHIA, TO(1851)
No. 100 Argued: Decided: December 1, 1851 THESE two cases were brought up from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, by…
Read MoreBENNETT v. BUTTERWORTH(1850)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1850 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court of The…
Read MoreBANK OF STATE OF ALABAMA v. DALTON(1850)
No. 108 Argued: Decided: January 1, 1850 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court…
Read MoreBALTIMORE & S.R. CO. v. NESBIT(1850)
Argued: Decided: December 1, 1850 THIS case was brought up from Baltimore County Court by a writ of error issued…
Read MoreSMITH v. TURNER(1849)
No. 42 Argued: Decided: January 1, 1849 THESE were kindred cases, and were argued together. They were both brought up…
Read MoreLUTHER v. BORDEN(1849)
No. 39 Argued: Decided: January 1, 1849
Read MoreCRAWFORD v. BRANCH BANK OF ALABAMA(1849)
Argued: Decided: January 1, 1849 THIS was a writ of error sued out under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary…
Read MoreWEST RIVER BRIDGE CO. v. DIX(1848)
Argued: Decided: January 1, 1848 THESE cases were brought up, by a writ of error issued under the twenty-fifth section…
Read MoreSTACY v. THRASHER FOR USE OF SELLERS(1848)
Argued: Decided: January 1, 1848 THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the…
Read More
